2.
is
भ
di gram
illustrating the
1
C.O
have
L.
A.
indicated
Attached to
that they recommend
the difference
the Committee's Report
10
the rates
and
it
between
their rates
and the governori
Proposals.
The
3.
allowances
perhaps
best be considered in relation to four
ranges of basic
identical
어 (21)
salaries, not quite
with those
(9) less than $150
set out in
p.m.
Para 5
(6) $150
$
400 p.m.
(c) $400
$1200p.m
(d) above $1200 p.m.
The rates proposed for (a) do not
differ greatly from those
but they
are
ཅ་
beni
paid
longer based
the
rehabilitation allowance.
The
V
embraces
vates for group (b), which the majority of locally engaged
Mercial workers, are
than the existing
oner
considerably higher
and higher also
than the revised Singapore rates.
both the
Governor
grounds in
and
the Committee
adduce special
support of this.
which
calculated
salary
Group (c) rates
steadily diminishing %% of basie
have been formulated with
suitable link between
appear to
the object of providing
D
the rates for group (b) and (1). The fact that
higher than the corresponding
they
Singapore rates
the remarks in
would seem
ѝ
not easy
to justify not withstanding paras 29-30 of the Lo Report, It that the arguments adduced in para
31 of that Report in support of equality with Singapore above
basic salary of $1400p.m
apply equally to the group (c) range of salaries;
paran 31 (e) (ii) + (iv) seem に
་
arque
undeed
agamist
Page 10Page 11
the need
Smiz apore
even