(220)
same result at the end of the tenth year of
service, but your proposal accentuates the
position.
2. Pa Scale suggested in my savingram
No. 196 was intended to take account of non-
acceptance of the recommendation of the Salaries
Commission for large (£90 per annum) increments
in the later years,
Commission proposed
of the twelfth year
the £90 increments.
Salaries
I note that
efficiency bar at the end
i.e. before the first of
such
3. If you are satisfied that the rapid increase
in total emoluments indicated above so early
in an officer's service would be merited by
his experience, I would suggest that the proposed
efficiency bar be moved forward from the end
of the twelfth year to
end of the eighth year
i.e. before the £135 increment in basic salary.
4.
Y
fight I ne consideration Should you, in view of the consideration
you
raised in paragraph 3 above, still consider that
the proposed scale should be
Hin
in these circumstances agree
should
2
adopted and should you
to move
that the efficiency bar
SLADY with am readyro moved as suggested I should be repared
to approve the scale set out in paragraph 1 above,
5. Your telegram No. 377.
I approve the salary for the post of Labour
Commissioner recommended by the Salaries Commission
for so long as the post is held by a Class I Cadet
also
and a fixed salary of $2,400 per mensem if the post
is held by a non-Administrative Officer.
6.*
(245)
126