2.
No.
Name
Works
Attendance
Conduct
4.
WONG CHUNG-NGAR
(PETER C.N. WONG)
Sir Robert McAlpine & Sons (Birmingham) Ltd. Birmingham.
100%
5.
CHONG KIA-TUAN
J.L. Kier & Co. Ltd. London.
100%
80
Excellent
(1) Ability
1
Keenness and
General
Mr. Wong was always Mr. Wong was equal to
(2)Technical Knowledge Application
to work (3)Standard of Work
The work carried out by Mr. Wong was done most efficiently, and he showed that he was very able to read construc-
interested in the
work and gave his
best endeavours throughout his
tional drawings, set out visit to the
He
the work and supervise its construction. was very familiar with surveying instruments and able to use them accurately and expedi- tiously. His measure- Iments of work done were
satisfactory and acarate. His draughtsmanship was very good.
Very good He is able to detail the
more common types of reinforced concrete structure and remembers what he is shewn. He has not a great deal of practical knowledge, but is learning. His standard of work has improved from fair to good. His draughtsmanship is quite good and his work is accurate.
contract.
He is very keen to learn and works hard and conscien- tiously.
!
the best of the
permanent junior assistant engineers employed on this contract.
Mr. Chong's work has improved satisfactorily during the past months and is still improving He is a bit shy and quiet, and must learn to assert himself more. He is a good worker.