252
The Chairman said in reply to the first
HKUAR
part of Professor Penson's question that No. 14 of
the papers circulated was a note by Mr. Sloss giving
a brief history of the growth of the University and
summary of its position as it was before the war; The I wought
and it would be a matter of no dificulty would it,
Mr. Slo£5?) to add to that statement on the factual
side as much more detail within limits as members
for excurdle the
•
thought useful, e.g.exot structure of the faculties,
position of teaching staff, problems of students, an
forth.
Dr. Priestley enquired whether it would be
possible for members to have a copy of the full
Report of the 1939 Committee.
MA 3loss said copies wer pot available.
It was a printed document of some forty to fifty
page. A summary of the recommendations was in the
document at No. 13.
Xxxitxnset:tha ishe xnixthe suggulan that par wapPS
اقتها
The Chairman asked whether it would meet
165 or two aucilable the wishes of the Committee if one copeswere circulated.
members
ཨ་རྒན་ར་
Mr. Slogg said that would hardly answer
the question.
The Chairman agreed that this would not
answer the question about the factual detailed picture
of the structure of the hiversity and the sense in
which it was in erpreting the wider political and
cultural aim of the original founders. If Professor Penson would indicate what kind of supplementary
information on the factual side would be of value,
Mr. Sloss would be willing to provide it. With regard
to the question as to the sense in which the University had
Univers w interpret the original cultural aim and what extent it had succeeded in this, he would ask Mr. Sloss
to speak.
17.
Mr. Slos S