163

42 -12-

Hey I have the date of the modifications?

enient the second, modifying, agreement was executed on 30th

vaa

January, 1941.

P. benest: I see in my mirate hore of 3rd February the referOTICO

to that.

That vso

the harm

if harm it be

was done; after the

five year tem had been agreed to; and also after the X.0.

decision that there was no objection to a few selected agencies

on slørt tara contracts.

You mean monopolius?

"e few authorized agencies on short term contracto".

Mere was no objection to -

To the selection of a few authorized agencias by the method of

tender, on hort term contracts. Midn't you come to the con-

clusion - you wcze present during the discussion in 3.C. - that

to each of those stipulations in that minute at least equal

forse should be attached that the authorised agencies should

be Tow, that the method of obtaining ah should be by tender,

and that the Curation of the agency should be a short term?

Yes, but I did not conceive that this aposent or any addition

to it was ande under tint allowance given go by %.C.

Did it never cocur to you that perhaps the 1.0. wight think that

your agreement ought to have been made th those safeguarda?

Fermission / do not regard as instructions,

mission to make certain artargoncnte.

Let us be gite securate,

they gave me

They told you thurt you might not do

certain things that you wished to do; but that you might, if you

desired agencies, do certain other thing@T

Having been present at the masoting in question, I know that

what the X.. had in mind was, instead of one monopoly for the

whole dolory, they would have a number of district monopolies,

an those arrangerente

Page 160Page 161

Share This Page