Saamo possibile,
India & Burma do
excluded, ie dat on with Cols will
also get
im bemfitf
"
of the text in No 76
12
the provision in para. (2)(iii) were inserted in the draft Treaty because it only excludes, from the holding of real property in China, "Nationals of H.M. Could belonging to India.
On this we have argued that an Indian "belonging to" Fiji or British Guiana was not excluded. In view, however, of the last paragraph of draft A2, this provision is now not likely to appear and the F.O. were quite positive that it would be impracticable to secure a provision Specific giving the right of Indians belonging to Colonies to acquire real property in China if Indians belonging to India are not to have these rights. If haven, as
Mr. Ashley Clarke impressed upon me that in view of the difficult stage which negotiations have now reached in Chungking it is very desirable that the telegram A2 should issue today.
you Trany
7.7.0
9.12.42.
For the moment
the point for
As
is
the diff bel 4.2
in
The
it's nlatim to Kenya
preservation of the Whiteness y
the Highlands.
If the Formela in para 3
is adopted,
that is this
good
as
we
can
hope for.
But the Ambassador is authorien
in this Aft hel to accept the best text which he can get from the Chinese. If this a simple reciprocal anangerment for national' treatment, that w be the worst for the Kenya position. I wd agree with A in M Parkurs
Ser Gent. 9/12
mimbe