162
obtaining assurances but I think we should try not- withstanding, for some understanding on the question
It has been suggested to me of personal status cases. that there will certainly be many such cases pending at the end of the war in Shanghai etc. and an under- taking on lines of paragraph 3 of the draft note, your telegram No. 1396, seems highly desirable.
I think we are unlikely to get anything on the lines
If not we of paragraph 1 and 2 of that draft. might try whether the Chinese would be prepared to re-affirm in some way paragraph 7 to the end of the group undec: ? draft agreement 7 of May 4th 1931.
This might (Sir M. Lampa on's despatch No: 705 of 1931). be better than nothing.
5. [sic] I will take un the point in paragraph 2 of your telegram. No. 1394 when the real discussions begin.
Your telegram No. 1394 aragraph 4 and 5.
1)
I agree and think that the Chinese may have objections to article 6. Consideration of points raised can be deferred.
7.
You will no doubt instruct me in due course as to the position in regard to
OTF.
ire.