Would it plasse them locally if
3
say
that
forwarded to
copy z
to the
have goved
conto
the Report has been
L.C. Dy the Admiralty
To que cared to be associated in the above
obrous ?
If so,
might
sand the
Report batter, giving
to the Admiralty by official latter,
proposed reff & caring whether they wish to
be associan?
Q.R. Romas
24/10
Yes
Mint
1/4/ ak
Y
4 To Alfort
Oday - A/Acpart in (3) for p.nr.
-Cons - 4/11/41.
M
Trans, to
5. Aduy
M.01453/41
15-11-41
M.014238/41
22-11-41
18114/3a/41 (Defence)
6. Admy
N° 5. No action is resemary rulers Treening
react with
Com
proposal to alter present Arrangements, but Registration appears to be insulted for correspondence
ace of this kind. The
last time ther this question came up, the
ar
registered partner news
Corresp. wen
have
Should be Defence
W
17/13114/31/40041. 5
in to whether regulatin "General" but we
had better be consistent. Perhaps R83 comes clear
N°6.
Min up with R 118,
To Governor by short derp, auf 3. as prospect a
It but associating the Lords Communer of the Achirally
Love the refoly перве
M3277.26/x1 atu