CO129-584-14 Commutation of death sentences to life imprisonment. Includes 9 photographs depicting- [CN 3-42] Commutation of... 22-12-1939 - 17-9-1940 — Page 88

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed
Series Prev Next

-15-

87

was a running fight, continued for a period covering all that area from the three boxes up to the Tak Hing Paint Shop and that at the end of it, in the heat of passion, the accused man cut down Leung Ki; that is manslaughter; but he did not, for having cut him down the first time, if I may continue with a botanical metaphor, he 'pruned' him three more times.

There is no reason why the heat of passion should have lasted long enough to inflict four blows. There is no reason at all for a man, however flushed he may be with the triumph of victory, however relieved he may be by the knowledge that he had avoided further attack, to repeat his savage attack on his assailant by striking three more deliberate blows such as we have here.

If you can account for these blows, gentlemen, as blows struck at random during the running fight, then again the defence of manslaughter would be available, but if you believe the story of the noodle seller that the blows were struck after Leung Ki was lying helpless on the ground there, there can be no question of manslaughter whatsoever.

So I come to the end of my charge to you. You will remember throughout that it is, as Mr. Prentis has been at pains to tell you twice, for the prosecution to establish the guilt of this man to your satisfaction - that is to say beyond any reasonable doubt - the sort of doubt that would make you hesitate before acting in important business affairs or in momentous domestic affairs. If you have any real doubt then don't find him guilty of murder: say "I am not sure." But the only other verdict - so far as I can see here, as the trial judge who is charged with the task of instructing you on the law, the only charge that I can suggest is one of manslaughter, and the difference there is this.

Edit History

2026-06-18 00:56:03 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
-15- 87 was a running fight, continued for a period covering all that area from the three boxes up to the Tak Hing Paint Shop and that at the end of it, in the heat of passion, the accused man cut down Leung Ki; that is manslaughter; but he did not, for having cut him down the first time, if I may continue with a botanical metaphor, he 'pruned' him three more times. There is no reason why the heat of passion should have lasted long enough to inflict four blows. There is no reason at all for a man, however flushed he may be with the triumph of victory, however relieved he may be by the knowledge that he had avoided further attack, to repeat his savage attack on his assailant by striking three more deliberate blows such as we have here. If you can account for these blows, gentlemen, as blows struck at random during the running fight, then again the defence of manslaughter would be available, but if you believe the story of the noodle seller that the blows were struck after Leung Ki was lying helpless on the ground there, there can be no question of manslaughter whatsoever. So I come to the end of my charge to you. You will remember throughout that it is, as Mr. Prentis has been at pains to tell you twice, for the prosecution to establish the guilt of this man to your satisfaction - that is to say beyond any reasonable doubt - the sort of doubt that would make you hesitate before acting in important business affairs or in momentous domestic affairs. If you have any real doubt then don't find him guilty of murder: say "I am not sure." But the only other verdict - so far as I can see here, as the trial judge who is charged with the task of instructing you on the law, the only charge that I can suggest is one of manslaughter, and the difference there is this.
Baseline (Original)
-15- 87 was a running fight, continued for a period covering all that area from the three boxes up to the Tak Hing Paint Shop and that at the end of it, in the heat of passion, the accused man cut down Leung Ki; that is manslaughter; but he did not for having cut him down the first time if I may continue with a botanical metaphor he 'pruned' him three more times. There is no reason why the heat of passion should have lasted long enough to inflict four blows. There is no reason at all for a man, however flushed he may be with the triumph of victory, however relieved he may be by the knowledge that he had avoided further attack, to repeat his savage attack on his assailant by striking three more deliberate blows such as we have here. If you can account for these blows, gentlemen, as blows struck at random during the running fight, then again the defence of manslaughter would be available but if you believe the story of the noodle seller that the blows were struck after Leung Ki was lying helpless on the ground there, there can be no question of manslaughter whatsoever. So I come to the end of my charge to you, You will remember throughout that it is, as Mr. Prentis has been at pains to tell you twice, for the prosecution to establish the guilt of this man to your satisfaction - that is to say beyond any reasonable doubt - the sort of doubt that would make you hesitate before acting in important business affairs or in momentuous domestic affairs. If you have any real doubt then don't find him guilty of murder: say "I am not sure." But the only other verdict - so far as I can see here, as the trial judge who is charged with the task of instructing you on the law, the only charge that I can suggest is one of mans laughter and the difference there is this.
2026-06-18 00:56:03 · Baseline
View content

-15-

87

was a running fight, continued for a period covering all

that area from the three boxes up to the Tak Hing Paint

Shop and that at the end of it, in the heat of passion, the

accused man cut down Leung Ki; that is manslaughter; but

he did not for having cut him down the first time if I may

continue with a botanical metaphor he 'pruned' him three

more times.

There is no reason why the heat of passion

should have lasted long enough to inflict four blows. There

is no reason at all for a man, however flushed he may be with

the triumph of victory, however relieved he may be by the

knowledge that he had avoided further attack, to repeat his

savage attack on his assailant by striking three more

deliberate blows such as we have here.

If you can account for these blows, gentlemen, as blows

struck at random during the running fight, then again the

defence of manslaughter would be available but if you believe

the story of the noodle seller that the blows were struck

after Leung Ki was lying helpless on the ground there, there

can be no question of manslaughter whatsoever.

So I come to the end of my charge to you, You will

remember throughout that it is, as Mr. Prentis has been at

pains to tell you twice, for the prosecution to establish

the guilt of this man to your satisfaction - that is to say

beyond any reasonable doubt - the sort of doubt that would

make you hesitate before acting in important business affairs

or in momentuous domestic affairs. If you have any real

doubt then don't find him guilty of murder: say "I am not

sure." But the only other verdict - so far as I can see here,

as the trial judge who is charged with the task of instructing

you on the law, the only charge that I can suggest is one of

mans laughter and the difference there is this.

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.