6
Your Calwetter_
(a) Do we know what 'lq'
comption.
Ames
Or is it a
(b) Have we any
senoon
To suppose
that H.M. don't requine Patheuns?
#lowell
MW. Cowell
br.
(a) '19' is not intelligible. Any variants the
Telegraph section can
sugust,
on
the pounds
of a possible comption of I fign in this
poups, are quite meaningless.
(6) We have no
as
cau su.
information on this point, as far
Prhaps the for's soure
information is purely local.
I have read over (10) to MW. Talbot (F.O.)
f
? Tel. to HH. as in draft herewith.
(Futh action is shil
repied as flapped below).
•
A. N. Galsworthy
( I father that Hankow in para. I should read Namhlam)
To You Ter 30 Lond
2.2.34