- 7.
-
26
of August 16th, reporting that we were surrendering
ourselves to the Hong Kong Government.
We also posted to
the Governor of Hong Kong and the British Ambassador to
China letters which contained our confessions and which
In addition we wrote separate letters
were prepared by us.
to the "Ta Kung Pao"
and five other newspapers as well
as to Reuter and two other news agencies, requesting them
to publish what had happened in connection with this case,
or if it could not be done to publish same as advertisement.
Fees for the advertisement were enclosed in the letters.
After doing all the above things, we have been
anticipating that the letters containing our confessions
would be widely published. Unexpectedly two days have
elapsed and there is still nothing doing. We are much
surprised. We think that upon receipt of the letters
containing our confessions, the various parties concerned
must have half-doubted and half-believed (our statement)
and might even have thought that we were not the men
responsible for the firing of the shots which killed the
Chinese traitor Ching Sik-kang on that very day.
In addition to the above statement of our
experiences in connection with the killing of Ching, we
want to advance the following facts in order to remove all
doubts so as to prove that actually we, the two men at
present making confessions to the Hong Kong Government,
are the killers of Ching and that the four Chinese brethren
against whom the enemy has insisted on the reliance of
manufactured false evidence, were in no way concerned in
the affair:-
1.
The revolver which was left behind in the theatre
on that very day was the weapon with which Chuk Chung-leung,
the No. 1 Maker of these Confessions, pointed at Traitor
Ching's head and fired 4 shots in succession and with which
he aimed and fired two shots at the middle of the body of
the +White Russian afterwards wounded but not killed.
It