2
of
1. F.o.
2. F.O
F.13656/188/10
(tis aflantan tel 169 of 22/12; lungshag
مه
8.14842/158/10
( two ~ / Canton tel 170 of 26/12;)
3. F.D.
4
F.13897/150/10
(two c/ t'hai tel 343 of 29/12; lungshag
you.
tel:6
policy re passengers
4.1.39.
maru
manu
(.)
4.1.39.
4.1.
u.)
39.
4.1.39.
vessels belieer
(Reconson of
4.2. Canton. Rege early reply.)
H.K.
~
5
you
даро
are
b. F.o.
(
al 7
4.1.39.
asks whether, by restricting papatect shipping,
causing breach of treaties.)
al
F. 168/79/10
Liscfttl from Canton, 2
с
of 4/1; asko whether he
6.1.39
can
Concu
in 4.
~4.)
This batch of telepams is of some importance in that this has beer a certain modification
of the British attitude on
this question,
in
ody to avoid an otherwise certain attitude
Headlock with the Japanese,
Thus in Nos. 30 A, the gov, & C. in C.
گر
at hast were still holding out for
a more
quitable solution of the present diffuultis
regarding shipping.
In 30 the Sov. proposed
to Mr. Blunt, as a
result of his discussion with
the C.in C. & 9.0.C., that the Fap. should be
sounded as to the
he
a
supestion that the night
repular Jap. & British shuttle service
of mchout ressels on a ship for ship basis,
The sap, reply is contained in B.2.