As
regards (3) the Japanese denial is
abound. It appears quite likely
clearly
that the planes
have been naval rather than military,
may
hot they
were
certainly Japanese.
?
18
Reply to FO
to FO reforming to (39), saying
that since the incident occurd a mouth
ago
& local protest were
loded with the
Japanive authoritis, the S.JS. would not in the cis
press for a further protest through H.M.'S
Ambassador in
Tobago. As regards
the
possibility of with aircraft fire, refer FO
to the Sovi's tel. at 40 (copy sent to FO
at 41), say
5. obsenro
that the S.JS.
that this was mentioned by
to Mh. Okajakai (see 47)
from the wife
The Sus
M. Blunt
And say that
s.ps.
at his] disposal the 5. PS.
hv
to be to roann se
slightest doubt but that the
has not the slightest d
acroplanes respons. the for the notation 5) HH.
tambory
win
Japanese.
My
And copy to A/M. H..
well).
(9 understand the FO han asked the Afre for thin hous; as
47
? Putly
48-51
The rumour that HK. is
beeing
used as a base.
guse
for Chinese was planes is
of
couse absend; &