5
We
myht
a
A d
That
no
further infor
from the Ger
on teeme
has been secund
req moking
the
of the action dirt
the China Berchants 5.N. Coy
117
Said to be bringing in the Counts
agimet 11⁄2 Chang Kee loy
12/0
by
ecopy
h
BEAT. LE
Ment.
$4.4
Japce with the action proposed, except that Jam not clear as to the sugeasted addition. The position in It.K., as lunderstand it, is twar thee Supreme Count Own in prection (see the copy
applies fa and
Enclosed in No. 7) was obtained in oron to
prevent the vissels in question from bring remont from H.K., as otherwise they night Evade the jurisdiction of the Counts of the Republic of China and thus render ineffection any Own by such Comets with regard to them or to any other property of the
Steam
Chung Kee Navigation Co Ltd, which is apparently
brunj wound up.
No. 12 refers to
"
that
I see the first anchoamne to
the case of China Merchanto
"Steam Navigation (arbitration?) versus Cheng kee "Company", linvict to not clear precisely boulest
proceedings this refers.
5/4/39
/t. Duncan