5
I agree that there can be no doubt that
Dr. Selwyn - Clarke's appointment to the Executive Council is intended to be definitive.
mads
(9) states that the appt. is ("pronsionally
& subject to H.M.'s pleasure","
? poceed
alove.
& we should
as in M. Meson's muute
A.N. Galsworthy
10/5
(I attack the R. I. for convenience of reference).
(و)
There is only one official member
ex-officio
of the F-x. Co. who is not an
mumber, though there is nothing to pre-
vent
being appointed. If or
more being
Selwyn Clark
were appointed definitively now, there would in theory be two sub- stantive official (not exotico) members, r a new provisional appl. could be made by the Gov. in place by Med retirement.
the absent for Headers.
that, until the latter's
As there is plenty of time, I should
be inclined to do indicate approval of
no more than the provisional appt. of
is Henderson,
Ar Selwyn - Clarke in place of at the same time enquiring whether the Gov. wishes yet be bandered to ItM. yet with regard to
that
ony
adisce should
The definitive appt. of Dr S.C.,
on Me It's retirement
Dr S.C., either
ar
before.
(6) (0)
As proposed.
NysAndrews
11. v. be at ance