3
kot
I revenues whereas the precedent fond aff aren thy represented houseds of sale
Gost Roperty which in the absence of ofinal legislation would autonahinch
foto lost revenues.
tomatically
f
by lay opinion is that no legislation is accessary bearry the satsriptions to a separate deposit at in the Public Teams (hara 6) + for the Urban Council &
adminidis the Cofendition on the objects
for which the
? refly
money
was
sub simbed. auggest
this effect &
to if not already done that lets of subsription shower be published,
I that the fund shone'd be audited
by
Gort Anditor, & an annual report of And buto and audited anouts
of
made
receipts & payments published each
year.
also assume that
We might al
n
charges will be made on the Fund for auf
services rendered by hort.
black
31/1/38
lajren with the Wasan that the proposa is
quil defferal from the Gook. House the fund bat
Hom
they wanks was a
I shoved have thought what
Gody off hashes, in whom the
lond would
be cashd
L
twho would control teu fund.
Why showed tim tep. Co. will time allowware of Un S. 528." (cloure 464) Gies)