Excentive Authority. I carnecty love that the carly nomination
and arrival of
Barrister
a
help to
Chief Magistrate may
terminate a state of things whore
e an
continuance would become intolerable coil.
homente
I have the hour to k
With the highest respect
Sir
اس نازک
most Medient Furyble Scrvant,
hu Ber
M. Mist. This is a continuation of the case of which the
is related in the Governor's preceding desp"? of the 7 June . N° 99. That despt reported that the Attorney Gend., M. Andly, had set- foot an inquiry into a chaye against the Acting Chief Magist. W! Witchell, of Feroing uptorted, or tried to extort money from certain prisontes in the geol. The enquire failed to establish that SM. Mitchell bask criminalles _ but that he had actest
indiscreetly, and, accors
ding
Acts of Pailiament, illegally, in his = capacity of Sheriff.
Dus.
to interfue. _ Feat if the Sherift illegally it was beyond
provine
other n and if proceedings were dropped Mitchell
Complaint. Best
Now cornes the
Sequel. Anstey,
Who, who the
from any
مروز مرد
ZVY
spucal
Penimosity against Mitchell, or from a pure desire that the administration of qualice should be beyond reproach, determines to act in his indurdual capacity of a Grand Juror (which sums strange, but may be according to law, and prosecute Mitchell. Mitchell was therefore tied at Ansteyps cistance, recquitted, wit Ching Austly attributes to the partial cumming up of the Justice . In return & in defence of his character. 7. Mitchell internates his intention of prosecuting Austy for defamation. The Governor, who deptores these unscomly goings on;
has used every effort in his power to arrest them, & the consequent public Scandal.
CAM- 2
- 86
My empiression is that it present
nothing
or ought to be done bythen I state : Indchett's Retion, whi is pending, may terminate unfacorally for M. Ausley - In the brown's Attorney General. I lo Concreted of defamation is a serious affair - and
of intemperatury the couples with his recent reckless cheese again
would together mark him as an Chief Justice, pason for so distinguished an office
bume a
unfit that of
Attorney Genual.. If, on the the hand, Austry is ast Convicted of defamation, and
if he apologizes for his conduct Cowans the Chief Justice it act the
question as to the interference which the J. of State should excriese one Afficer, sof... to querel and distect the harmony fo Community. But it appears to me theat the mornent for that interference has not sviceed. & may not arrive. Austry's conviction of the the pending may queally help to settle the becsine ?!
twal
Home to you
But I forward them to
With in fo
محال الماس لندر
-
Components a Dispute betion My Stugtog
Locat
6 Feb.
7.78 Mgr
fansral other Wife Bil