was
brought
A
notice I laid
the
the correspondence before
mecutive Council and they agreed
with me
r even
that however inclrudent illegal Mr Mitchell's
confuet had been, the evidence was
not of a character to justify my stering a prosecution on behalf of the Crown - But when the Attorney General determined to proceed in his individual capacity Grand Juror and expressed
his own opinion that he should.
prosicute to conviction, I did not feel myself authorized to put
a
veto uhon
his
proceeding - and
the action terminated as
you
will.
see in the acquittal of
defendant
85
the
Another action is now
pending being brought by the Chief Magistrate Against the Attorney General for defamation This be the result what it may,
will no doubt be the subject of after Communication
parties.
from
both
I am sorry to say that the ramifications of these unfortunate disputes exhibit themselves in
-
many forms, and that partisanchip is found to obstruct the administration of curtice and
the
proper influence of
the
су