of
titte under
the condition's explained
para!
any
It is assumed, howens, that
deposits received in cash would be
included in the statement.
DCA.
As some ocks Colonies, eg.
traits
Lettlement's do show afferently simila
deforts of securities in their Assets ofiets
Vetements, I showed be
frateful
if you
would
Day
wheat the omission of then deposits
is in any way undesirable.
I take it the document's deposited would be sched recorded in inventore's
Subjected broutine verification by Auditor, &
مثلا
can
be taken for franted.
lebark
19/5/19
Mr.
Walker.
No. 3459/1.
I know of no reason why the omission from
the Statement of Assets and Liabilities of deposits
such as these should be considered undesirable and
while I think it is probable that records of the
securities would be kept and examined, and the
securities themselves inspected by the Auditors
periodically, I propose to verify from Auditors
that this is actually the case.
May
8
Page
Page
(GIB)
May I have two copies of the reply which is
sent to the Governor please ?
ра
5. Allen Sweth
Deputy Director of Colonial Audit.
3815735
? reflyer in my him of 19/5
G. Ware 27/6 MEAntiohus
29/6 a
Shant.
1/4 at
To H. thong. 2004. (5 uund).
1.
1989
NOTED PRECEDENTS
Scopies for P. bi A.
ві
ru ap
་ .
Two copies of No. 6 taken.
J.C. Fister
Deputy Director of Colonial Audit.
18 July, 1935
ge 9
ge 9
P
7. S. Caine Ro
137.39
10
(Acks 4. In view of angl's, now made, it is not expected hat!" cartition. by For. will be necessan)
? This is satisfaction rear be
put on
when
Precedents have noted
The earlier comes
Visandrews
31. vii. 39
No. 3482/4.
Mr. Andrews.
Seen, thank you. I have already received
a report on the new arrangement from the
Auditor.
MC. Rister
Deputy Director of Colonial Audit.
11.8-35.
NisAndrews
10/8 at once
P
10
10Page 11