- 2.

the restriction from the Crown Lease.

The answer, as I

conceive it, is that Government is not intimately concerned

with details of reconstruction.

Government has from time to time leased land on

favourable terms (i.e. without payment of premium and at

a nominal Crown rent) for charitable religious or educational

purposes, to institutions belonging to the people of various

races nationalities religions and denominations.

Matters

of reconstruction of trusts must of necessity be left to

the management of the institution concerned.

I would

respectfully suggest that Government has only to consider

whether the charitable religious or educational purposes

are being fulfilled by the user of the land, or by the

application of the proceeds, in the event of licence to

sell being granted, in such a way as to justify the

favourable terms provided by Government.

6.

7.

The Petitioner is acting on the advice of an

eminent solicitor, and it may be assumed that what he now

proposes to do could not be regarded as a breach of trust.

The question arises as to what payment of Crown

rent should be made by the purchaser of the section, in

the event of sale being authorised. It would seem only

fair that he should pay at the rate appropriate to the

district. Of course, the higher the Crown rent, the

lower would be the purchase price, and it seems to me to

be entirely a question of how far it is intended that the

Petitioner, in his fiduciary capacity, should benefit by

the proposed transaction.

The Petitioner wishes to sell

land which has been acquired by his Institution without

payment of premium.

8.

The Declaration of Trust referred to in Section 7

of Ordinance No. 4 of 1925 constitutes what might be described

15

Share This Page