3
Precedents
busty dinsion
X
this anty
Nowell
1618/58.
No frecedent's have been unearthed for the delegation of lowers of remission under CR, 2.41 with to magistrates medical offers.
Arguments against playing this dutin
were fut by Myasa in
on medical officer
25395/34 + I should thin
afflies 6 the magistars.
like consideration
In perval it is regarded as
undesirable that the town to rait
~
the Dept concerned
writi
X shoved he delegated to the Recounting of in
to the responsible Head of but the are precedent's eg. Kenya 23205/24 Mot where power was swein & Commissioner of Londo twave fees up 4/25 on grounds of hoverty,
The argument
in have a does not
inpress me. In general
Assessment
the duty of assesso
showed he kept didinct from that of
the revision by the assessor
collection
perse showed be confined & cases where thenight of adde, information justifis
A
a
review of the
assessment to
originally, made,
Sulpect to Conditions
in WR 241
It is not clear whether magistrates
& medical officers
of 450:
are subject to Baró limit
d'incline to think they
this assumption
tre
I would approve
making clear
2014
de
laiding practice explaining fenerally
as at /xx
f
I would not approve any
considerables