6
present despatch, and I should have thought that the
provision for arbitration formed an adequate safeguard
for Air Ministry interests.
? copy of 10 to Air Ministry ref. 22 on the
'37 file, inviting observations on the point raised
in
paragraph 4, and asking whether they have any
comments to make on the arrangement referred to in
paragraph 5; and enclose a copy of the 1894 circular
despatch attached.
Point 2.
A-N. Galsworthy
25.4.39.
The conception of the payment of
26 year's Crown Rent' as simply a payment of rent, contain-
ing.
no
implications of purchase, seams-consistent
with The provision, reported in hava. 801-(19)
53514 /38 for proportionate repayment
on
if the land were surrendered to The Col. Gait. before the expiry of 25 years.
Point 3.
preference for
The Gow, does not explain his
"The value to the Col. Gait."
ralves Than say, "The assessed value" in the Clause relating to relinquishment. Eat It will
be seen
from $907 (19)
clause was to read:
on 53514/38 that the
On relinquishment of the area by the A.M. at any time the Col. Goit, shall refund to the A.M. The whole of the costs of resumption and such part of the costs of formation buildings as shall represent the value of these works rebuild- ings to the Col. Govt.
The 'works' might be worth nothing to the Col. Gait. wither for their own use of the land
[or