3
?
No reply need. to (3).
weht
now su
4. Gavlet 23
no4
mwork.
Nitarday
6.2.37
6.2.37
to objection to transfer of Tetley, but in
to be tranfeaned
that event r
vacancy
to medical deft. Does not
exporto defto should be
favour single
I do not quite
the infarts
opeciebered
analyst deft.
understand why
the autre
A
4. K
ar
to make
separate establishment
Heers my any
there
in view
o
the fact that they wo
smyle establishment for analgusto
this
S.S. •
elsewhere,
that thoro
not
werk
However, า
presume
a
fount
we should
the Gov's opinion.
O
th- Iche case
C. R 37479.
He has sauled 4/ ons for
Gepris negid
Q
☆wers against
offer the fost
Leewith (3)
1) to he Tettey, a vififo valany
% Kove.
V.
medical def!
E
to Proms
१०
१०
aff!..
? Cope (of (3) + (4) to go a P.F. of how Testery, ack is say my that slopes are bery like to
send aut
a suitable car cedulí
P. Ropes 8. J.
early as possible,
Asat of butfirst arculate
v.f. current.
9. abou