33
that they should follow the report of the expert
committee.
I therefore pass through Mr. Walker for
any comments he may have on sections 358 onwards of
the Bill, which deal with savings banks. I regret
that the Bill was not referred to him in the first
instance.
I suggest that an additional memo, modifying
our draft and incorporating the suggestions, above,
The walker made by Mr. Dale, and any observations may have
to make, should be sent to the departments/concerned
for concurrence.
? So proceed.
P. Rages
18. vii. 38.
Save 364. I do not know why, monchly
lemit has been adopted
who
on a man
fola
it might be hard
legacy.
I think, in addition &point's
made in
first 2 sub faras of draße (I assume the suggestion re inclusion in Rules not ordinance afflies both to moniter, or annual, as well as havemin
hình)
mouthes
!
we might point out
SO Cttee recommended
limit
f
that
that the
an annual & am
aggregati
as regards the latter it is
afflied to deposits made by the depositor
مقلنسابو
not to increases by accrual of interest, as that interest credited ta deposit the which
the aggregate increases the account above the limit is not debarred from earning interest. The form of the male suggested bravois Colonies "to depositor shall be entitted Ideposit in
in laches
of (E 200)
ut any
کا نشا
one-year increase by way of deposit the total amount
Uy
any