- { -
RECEIVED
57854/357
1
ased tey ton bed Te:1:009 tæl Snad stez yď woy of Jase ent nt abso1 ANT .dotaqash Tag to stab erit in beraviIsb
batorriznos od IIt sets (Jusamotne wolf en- ..1) 7 gaol vol
odd Date Vie÷IIIM at yď visioe ballortoos bue beatstatem
OJ KO TOVO medt gæst of vilash on zen tasarısvou Isino100
woy yd bevisOST Sonic qu¤ SNT .Yew vos at asit sev TO STANE out to dreq 9[ɗarabian100 B Tevo nottвool abiw snt worla [Itw
doidw ebaor add to astTOJITIST well ant to noftroq mistitu¤2
ym to (d)0) bae ‚¿‚↓ zriqstysisq to tostdra Isutas 9+ SISW
To se tedt foodtient and to sost al oteqaab evoİVƏTÇ
Jooo Is Dettreûlaer bлe offaiqvot,I»tutinottys silt yon? ze 2003 28 9 1 Hat [Iiw absoï szedt Tavo bas gпols 90 Bioco di *ed) Mesya Iest ton ab I offert of beasyo 978 nottomuzzo all matst or humavou Istrofo si zot eldaititz vj sved vodiIM 248 Tint C.renstaiam Tiwit tot yitkat to
tedd spotsiwis ejod I „otiz oq tu marit ed* Ford Esbaed
JOSADZMETIK nit Topicboost of vidaaLDEWA) YAW Tooy 998 lliw roy .dotegzeb 19#rot ym to (0), nigstzeteq ni biawrot Juq
1 to New ya Anse oft sideztvba ti berebienos I
.a
writ gribnswO0 790İTTÜ Intense add of adquigs78q gnibeɔsnq ¿Hi to you delwoned szolɔne I has yattırɔz ekri zot agoor
god I
. 10 tnemeghefwomios y to bn vigen 'yonelle S & I∙Look
SOVGLOZ HEA mer end gaibantershavein To Jdual Toì HOOT [le Jact.
2.
af :
!
vanor ert sved I
Ti2
otando team Ivey
محمد
voi pretovoÊ
He. CONFIDENTIAL
AIRMAIL
52654/16
16
53654/56
Sir,
C. O. REGX
GOVERNMENT HOUSE,
HONG KONG.
23rd March, 1937.
I have the honour to address you on
the various points referred back for my
consideration in your Confidential Despatch
dated the 1st January, 1937.
2.
The stipulation suggested in your
third paragraph was understood both by the General
Officer Commanding the British Troops in China
and by myself to be implicit in the last sentence
of paragraph 2 and the first sentence of
paragraph 10 of my Confidential Despatch dated
the 25th November last. His Excellency has now
been good enough to confirm this implication
and the stipulation stands therefore as you
suggest.
3.
I now pass to the suggestion contained
in your fourth paragraph; which reflects, I am
afraid, an insufficiency of clarity in my previous
despatch. The purpose and, I submit, the effect
of setting a maximum figure of $975,000 in the
penultimate line of paragraph 2 of that despatch
was not to accept any liability on behalf of the
THE RIGHT HONOURABLE
W.G.A.ORMSBY-GORE, P.C, M.P.,
&C.
&C.,
&C,,