рто
4
It has already been accepted that
Mr.Wilby should be given special seniority and the
complications
present applications have arisen from the formula
adopted for that purpose. It seems to me that the
logical thing to do is to adjust his seniority rather than
to alter the relative seniority of Messrs. Dyer and Walton.
On the basis of service and qualifications he is clearly
superior to both the others, between whom there is nothing
to choose. I should have thought that the fair thing to do would be to make him senior to both, leaving the seniouty Mesars Dyer Walton it's me to be gourmed by the uncial rule.
Under the alternative in Mr.Carstairs'
minute the final order would be:- Walton, Wilby, Dyer
and the possible grievance would rest with Mr. Dyer in being
placed below Mr. Walton.
Under my alternative the
final order would be:- Wilby, Dyer, Walton and the
possible grievance would rest with Mr. Walton in being
placed below Mr.Wilby.
I don't know that it matters very much
which is adopted, but on the whole I think that the
latter is in all the circumstances the more suitable.
14th February, 1936.
A s
a
special
mads
i
Mr Willy
mut was
Willy ; case
I think bo
Hoop med
Le must.
jumer to
Mr Walton
• senior to Mr Dyer:
is to my mind supported
o this order is
in M Carstairs minute. Waliyent
by
X
28.2