23

(e) Banking partnerships formed in fi.k.

(Since 1911, maximum number of

partners, 20; before that, no limit).

(f) Banking partnerchips formed and

t

esķablichod outside H.K. and opening

branches here (apparently no limit

to number of partners).

a

4. It will be seen that the desirability of

control, and the possibility of control, very considerably

between the various classes of banks, and even between banks

of the same class. For example, we do not require any further

control in the case of a bank established by a special

local Ordinance. In class (b) we have a free hand for

any future banking companies, and & reasonably free hand

for banking companies already cstablished under our

Companies Ordinance. In class (c) no further control is

necessary in the case of a bank established by Royal Charter,

but in the case of banks established under Companies Acts

or Ordinances in other parts of the Empire there are just

the same dangers and difficulties as in the case of banks

established under our Companies Ordinance. We could deal

with such companies only by placing restrictions on their

commencing business in the Colony. Similar remarks apply

to class (d). Class (e) includes the large and im tant

class of Chinese banks, where supervision would be very

It would probably be useless unless the

same supervision were applied in the case of class (f), where

the supervision would be still more difficult. Mr. Shenton

proposes that the control end supervision which he suggests

should apply to all banking undertakings carrying on

difficult.

banking business in the Colony.

5.

I am not in favour of attempting the control

Share This Page