the owners of neighbouring lots found that they

had been injuriously affected although they had

no reason to anticipate it before the undertaking

was begun.

Clause 7 (3).

Words should be added to provide that if

the claim were in respect of a sum exceeding

$1,000 (or whatever the present limit is to warrant

the case being heard in the Supreme Court) it

should be heard before the Chief Justice.

The claimant should be allowed to amend his

Statement of Claim when the case is to be heard

before a Judge.

In line 1 it should be made clear that the

word "acceptable" is to be interpreted as meaning

acceptable to the claimant.

Clause 7 (6).

This should be qualified so as to allow a

right of appeal up to the Privy Council on a

point of law although not on a simple question of

the amount of compensation awarded.

Clause 10 (1).

What exactly does the word answerable"

mean? In any case, in view of the exceptional

conditions, e.g. typhoons, which are met with in

Hong Kong, the liability of the owner of a vessel

or float should only be founded on negligence.

Finally, Mr. Looker said that many people

still held the view which was put forward in the

criticisms of the earlier Bill that the Bill should

provide that the Government may not contemplate any

undertaking which would have the effect of destroying

any

Page

Page

any existing private enterprise, e.g. reclaiming

the foreshore in front of any of the Dock

Companies, but on that point I suggested to

him that whether or not it was likely that the

Government would do any such thing, it would

nevertheless, I should say, be asking too much

of the Government to insert a clause depriving

them of the power in the ultimate resort to

take whatever steps might be necessary in any

contingency in the public interest, and I drew

his attention to the terms of Clause 11.

No doubt the question of compensation which

any such drastic action on the part of the

Government might involve would ensure that the

Government would not decide in favour of any

such undertaking without the most serious

reason. But it would surely be impossible

for any Government to bind itself in the way

he suggested in respect of existing enterprises.

Mr. Looker said that he quite understood the

force of this opinion and he would propose to

include it in his memorandum to the China

Association.

He finally said that if

Mr. Cowell wished to discuss these points with

him further he would be happy to come along

after a month's time during which he is going

on a cruise. He agreed with me that many of

the points he had raised were drafting points

which might be corrected at the Committee stage

of the Bill,

Pending

ending any formal reference

to the Colonial Office by the Governor or by

the China Association, this paper can be put by.

Der Gent

27/2/36

Share This Page