4
(5) JO.
reply
will
Ks.
10/4/35
8/4
Ref (2)
agnees
questions
political
legal
lans.
1.4. 35
funds. cappy
shel.
be dealt
ather than
CA
The Admurally will expect
views.
We can
a letter containing
our
sofely agree with the statements that the
question is one
which
should
be dealt with on
a firstitical rather than a legal basis, and that
the stipulations for
be omitted. Also
6
no torture
m)
fair trial and objection
can be taken to
the dini. that private
vessels
tatter captured
in info.. waterways should be handed our to
the liminere authorities invariably, and that in
circs.
the same
hermel cefilmed within the
"
should
3 mile limit.
م صل الله
there.
in Q, however, I think the
exceptional circumstances"
actions
too much, and I would
As regards
Α
uce
4. the words
would
linist ar
arisa uch
as
with the
ot all
Ivene
clear
who
will
he
be inclined to substitule
circumstances
to issue
Is it to be
Where
DES
sare special
the
further it is
Care
not
the authority
the special instructions suggated
the Gin-C,
as
Nawal affair? If he is to
the 5.0. Bork is a
be the authority it
will be extremely difficult for him
instructims
ultra virs
1
in this direction.
to
issue
which will mot he
Or is it to he the Judicial Authorities
beer anceled;
the colony, uber the parates have here again fissions difficulties would arve.
On the whole I think
not to write
the next move
show us
it would be better
to the Ad. yet, but to ansait from them
when they will protalde,
how they view @.
Krament.
4/4/35
I don't think we want to express any onwo at present. " copy & H.K. curet 10-
#lowell 4