the equity of the proposed repcupent-
53
by the H.D. of half the cast of the
extension à question
This
is in line
with
The decision
regending the costs
f
The alsodore
as a whole
in which convexson
we suggest refle to the Treas.
keller
5. 26690 of the 11th Jan. 1928
to the AM and connecter
Cones &
You may also Упишать
like to see the muc.copy fo
desp. from St. describing the
Consultations piececting the
ja
inception /
I
the extension, and
I subsequent tel.comes re
ட்
(cops in
1/52753/25
Ju
view of the above, we
the Yard
hope that you
will agree that-
Her fasts in relation to the
Kai Tak Extension
2 HK may
without delay be Heimbursed
in reput
of the An Rusty's share
of the cost or this work.
badly is dispute, and that the
toestan
The delay is fenticularly