It is quite possible that the Guv- himself
will comment upon
upon the
but ever printed
if he
-"H.K.
does not
and
matters raised by Sil.G.M.,
has been 27
1
Ole
report-
there has been
issued;
no
here
in the circumclances
suggection of printing have
alterations of text would be impossible,
even if
personalside
such alterations, at the request of accoutside the
Committee
wome politic.
? Acknowledge (65) and
ん
(57) separated
5/0, for signalux my
For Cowell
and stating
that we
are
awaiting the
Gov's.
report.
his report may
Then telegram to Gov. acking when
be expected
7/12/33-
cdy d
св
On Mr Gent's instruction I have had Ammuttle Report sent to the F.O. Hp. jr inf.
Re
9/12
58 20 7.0.. we end. mi (48) –
Bib
9
DEC 1935
+ Cand 3424
71929
In No. 55 Sir George Maxwell suggests that
the Committee of unofficials in Hong Kong who have
produced the report enclosed in (48), might be asked
to re-write certain passages. It is clearly too late
for that to be done, and in any case I think it would
have been unwise to have made any such request to them
As regards the possibility of the friendly Government
of China being offended by some passages in the report, I doubt if we need take that too seriously, particularly since the last White Paper published on
the subject of mui-tsai included very outspoken
X
descriptions