}
-12-
Submit no misdirection
no ground to interfere with
conviction.
59
CCURT ADJOURNED TO 2.30 F., CN 12.10.34
James J. Hayden.
11.10.34
12/10/34
2.30 P..
Same Counsel & Solicitors (Appellant not present).
1. Lim addresses Ct. in reply.
re Lisdirection as to 2 bruises on p.14 of 9.-up para.
11
3?
p.13 "It may be no more
?
19
9
a
#
#1
than that.
籍
p.15 "The alternative is
not to accept at the moment E. Davies' evidence.
As to Law,
2 C.A.R. 207 R.v. Cohen
7 C.A.R.
4
A
R. V.
alison
1 C.A.R.
234
-
R. V.
Lucas
5 C.A.R.
193
A
R. v. Loates
11 C.A.R.
166
R. V.
Kurash. Refers to lines 33-36
on p.169
23 C. A.R.
190
- R. v. Morrissey.
20 C.A.R
162
R. v. Driscoll.
Deals with His-direction 2(a)
re rounds of law re grounds 1, 2 & 3.
There case equally consistent with innocence case
should be withdrawn from Jury.
Where whole of evidence equally consistent with guilt
or innocence case should be withdrawn.
ce.
9 Halsbury 449.
Last ground re admissibility of Irs. Fairburn's eviden-
trial.
3 C.A.R. 259 R. v. Payne re no objection taken at
14 C.A.R.
R. v. Sanders.
s case as
Did not raise objection at close of Crown
taken by surprise when told Mary P. was not going to give
evidence.