5
This has nothing
to do with the case I frant
A
:
The sentence in the 1934 Report Dvout the motor car registrative fees is correct & I see no ground for supporting
it deration; but I do think are should reconsider the position.
feht
Weren, in July 1933 (on 11015/15/33) the Sound to our suggestion to convert this tax int an
demurred to
import duty
we bird the BFT that we would defior
commecating withit the longlo-Dutch Trealy position had crystallized (16 on 11095/10/33), con
In loved 1934 (see euchs. to 23 on 31801/18/34) the tetherlands fout were inft that N.17.9. in the UK. olid not concur in their veux that we could not infore
to suphore
duties on the basis of origin of goods. They have not returned any reply ait seems reasonable now.
accept the situation.
that they
don
"We exframed the writion to the S.S., Malay Staten in 24/25 on 3/801/197/94 and sent coher of the despatcher to it. &. for rif"; but have had
and Ceylon
no
reply.
In the circs I think are
might write to the
900!, refer (26) on 31801/19A/34, enquiring what
stakes he is taking in the matter
D. date
5.12-34
Conexce
Mr Care,
to the
news
to
}
make
out E
refer
to
منا
Int
the files referes
for or I can
the para? at A
different point in
Different treaty.
interpret" of a
Anyhow I
that the
am
a