together, since the amount representing the banks' "turn"

on each remittance is saved and becomes available, in

see also below -

such proport i ons as may be agreed

in relief of the cost of homeward remittance by the Colonial

Government and of outward remittance by the Home Government.)

We have read your correspondence with the

Financial Adviser, but have not been able to make out what

the objections are to a renewal of the arrangement agreed

to in 1924; and we are inclined to agree with the Financial

Adviser that the principle of collaboration with the Colonial

Government is not affected by the conditions for the time

being of the exchange.

It might be of interest to compare the amounts

actually renitted by the Colonial Government and raised by

the Treasury Chest during the period covered by that agreement,

and to work out how much could have been saved by the two

together

69

Page 70Page 71

Share This Page