}
20 7.0. wydup: Desp: & plans.
bous:
6
26 FEB 1934
3 F.0. F 1099/1099/10.
Submit's obsons. Requests that
ashed
9.3.34
be your.
to consider whether scheme could
be carried out with consent
owner
Chinese
concerned. Has telegraphed Sir A Cadogan
as to probable reaction of chinese gout. if expropriation scheme
s proceeded with
4. ED. F1099/1099/10.
To tel. 6. f.
scheme.
Si.a.
conf. Cadogan
re
9.3·34
expropriation
Ref 3
The F.O.
Considu
the
thight be
used
Various arguments which
in justification of the present
and future exercise by HM's Government of
Jurisdiction
Kowloon City. The conclusion is
reached (para 2) that, while there
arguments
in justification
Over
jurisdiction by Thing.
use
Strong
the present Kowloon City, the
Case for future exercise of that fuusdiction, in
the face
a
dum and for the restoration Chinese jurisdiction, would
Strong
City
15
4
not be Equally
unless it could be established that
the Exercise of Chinese furisdiction in Kowloon still inconsistent with the military requirements for the defence of Hong Kong.
Generally the F.O. take the view that the
the right of Items Government to
question of
to
Contime City is dormant
Exercise jurisdiction over Kowloon that it should if
, and
possible, be allowed toremain dormant.
The only means whereby this result can be achieved without abandoning the project for the clearance of unsanitary buildings
within the city and for the Establishment of a parks,