I discussed this further with tr Roberts
ray, pointing out that one of the reasons
which, apparently, influenced ir tafford
Crips in nolding that the nip Order in
the case of guyen might be held to be
invalid was that it nad not been establisn-
ed that guyen was a subject of Indo-China.
"he amendment proposed by the overnor
in sec. 6 (I fa of the Deportation Ord-
inance would preclude the issue of a ship
order until the national status of the
deportee had been established; and if this
had been done in the guyen case I doubt
if the ship" order need have been with-
drawn.
owever, the ome Office only use the
guyen case as an iliustration. If they
seek to found further arguments upon it,
we might take up this point. In the mean-
time I think that we can press them on
general grounds to agree to the amend-
but I have ments proposed by the overnor, cut out from the draft the 5 Nguyên hay
જ
referenses
name
5. 1. 34
14
10
11. To fo
но
whe 10
b.b
34
The 70 telephoned toray that they had no comments
boffer
on
No.10,
buttav
they
assumed that
we
And in due
course pecolo the you the point made in
pam 3 of no. 6.
Wybui
18/1/374