23.6.32
4466 of
typescript
Piha chipt
p.62 type
up. 45 of
Zimmern & Christie's is the only evidence on which
you omuld find association between Pr. à La «
It is all uncorroborated even when you woulde expact
oerroberatiom.
Plat conceived at the moment of winking (ŭk. p.188). To maye introduced to 77. by FZE 4
that within a week of the 5th March he new all about
S. & Chr, were intimate friende, Jung à imi Hing Fai, Ths. said he did not even know Lek,Fu's name (p.1m),
199
but sam Duys,(p.122) where mid Pr. kad mentioned her naɛs, 2. smid (p.92) that he could not remember if be typescriptntioned in his first statement the conversation at the
Nathan Ketel about getting rid of rung.
the ef
De you believe
Do you belive that r, would have spoken to Christie about killing ting when he had first see him only 4 hours
before.
Would 75. offer $10,000 when he get it done fer
$2000.
Ge not know how
dseng would be madeto suggest that his own akMATÍ ST would drive Christie away after the murder.
Abamos of oerroboration of Pr.te pro»enes at the
Tung Ban Hotel.
Openness of driving sut to purchase poison.
Thy abould the Ŋr, kem the poison if Christie were It is absurd that "r. should have taken ɛoing to do it.
it to try it on a obiekent.
siy should the second syringe be given to Christie, Maisiksa visits. This mashes . à Christie's evidence. Non-identifiention of Cheung at la à Le1»«off - one of 2. à car's blackmailing devices,
namunod iimne - Cheng shiu 200.
Aubtlety of the
Jonversation at mar 1
a
C Deems to be
mistake for
Che p. 64 of
typeampt
incredible. Going to Davidson was mother part of the Reasons given were ~ (1) that bhr. might tell 2.
of the plot, bimeɛmailing plot.{2)5 get a rescipt((2.9.100) to get
advice to swindle
(117)