23.8.32
incited hám to marder.
195
Defence say Z. à Chr. have perjured themselves,
involving the life of Pr. The only reason which the defence
givos is that they have done so to save themselves from the
con = @qu en ces of the intended swindle.
The story of 2.
ɑr. was not shaken one iota.
The Máa growa of the evidmce..
The case was opened at the Police Court at the end of
April. It was not till the end of June that
evidence was discovered.
Grown had to choose between Chi & Pr.
sh uld be prosecuted rather than the agent.
Qui was not charged.
The principal
That is why
Conditional pardon. A false story would imperil his
life. The defence have suggested no reason why he should
tell a false story.
the
Discrepancies. There are always some, unless/story
is concocted.
1.
*
There are here no important discrepancies.
Miscrep. between hdß King Fai à the amah.
p.83 of
lipe script
2.
$200 loan: does not matter:
but (1) wife of chauffeur and
8233
(2) she had disappeared.
Dimerep. between . & Lau Mo Kong.
Kervousness: faster driving:
leath road »
Doubtful if any
discrepancy, 1.8. that Lau's observations were at fauit.
Those tiny details do not matter. Lau was a friend of Pr. Px.
him money.
Fa
Dimorep. between Chai & Cheung Ka Mau.
New Statements.
$180 to $200) (230. Xo reason why thai mhould lie about it. Cheung would not like to admit much a large amount sa he denies membership of the gang »
Police Court proceedings started on the
5th April: dharge then "persons unknown": not till and
of June that Œmi fell into the hands of the Police:
eertain evidence then beenme of new importante.
1.
ui re 19th March p.160
(113)