194
23.8.32
on may date
twe
those two dates.
Re X Lindaell
The compound at Police E.Q. is open to the public
by day à by night.
It became public knowledge that there had been an
arrest in this onse, on the Est April,
Case for the frown.
Pr. entitled to any reasonable doubt, but Crown is
not bound to give actual demonstration.
It is
case of
cirmama tantial evidence,
Duty of counsel for the Crow to put all the facts,
not to presa for a conviction.
Base strengthened s ince opening.
1. Admitted that Fr. went to Hathan Hotel on the
night of the 17th/18th March. Room engaged,
faked cal 1. Tot denied.
Visit of Zimmern & others to Nathan Hotel on the
night of the 20th/21st March, Defence suggested
as a reason that Z. à Chr. wanted to get Pr.
involved in an assaut on Fangs that Fr. agreed
only on condition of slaŭping only.
Pr. had lost face, and wanted to alap Pung's face
all right.
If Zimmern & Christie's story is not true then the
true facts have not been put before you by the defence.
Defence of intended swindle. I have never understood
Samity would give no ground for the swindle:
the defen -
murder wouldə
Oo incidence unparalled if r. innocent.
Zimsen's statement of the"31st March" (2nd. April -
-
p.104). His reason – seeing Pr. & Brutton fear of
double crossing.
Z. had reason to fear only if 7r. had
(118)