22.6.32

23.8.32

193

accused.

Sheldon.

The result of Petter's argument would be that the

socused in such a oase could never be convicted if neither

the nocused nor the assassin gave evidence, There is

e.g., Deddon, Dmith, Armstrong.

constantly a gay! There is always one in the anae of

circumstantial eviden os.

Potter..

the

Sheldon did not mention/one point that I have argued,

the agency of Laue The cases which he mentiɑned were all

direct mirders. They provide no analogy.

The Crows asked for the admission of the Zim0.00 2073 &

Christie evidence only to prove motive, not to prove agency.

I hold that there is evidence to go to the jury.

Adjoumed to Tues. 23rd. 10 Səmə

Tuesday Bård August. 1932.

Pottez

I ask tăiat the legni point argued yesterday may be

treated in the same way as the other laɛal points.

I agree.

Timothy Hurony

3.

(Called to assit accused).

XX Jenkin

P.M. on

25th March Mr. Brutton

A. 3.7. Abou

attended on me at my office with the socused. I asked Kr.

Brutton if le accused would be available to the Police

at any time if wanted. Mr. Brutton after refering to the

accused assured me that he wo LA 1. ĐÃ

They again attended at Police H.Q. on the 4th April.

The accused was then arrested.

They did not not attend en me at the Police H.Q«

(111)

Share This Page