2.6.32
I do not ramanber anything about the letting of the back cubicle. It was let in the 4th 5th meus (2 May to
3 Juls).
186
I
the room next the kitchen
Yes.
It was not let before that. It Was Umially
used as a servante room.
That room was let only to that
I
particular party, and no me else, Shanghai people.
3 sagother at most. I es ied one of them Mr. (Sing hang).
I have not seen him about this court. 1 recognise this
I BAMS ( MÁ Nang Man). He is the man I called Er. recognine Sch. 36 à 48. This is the photograph of the man who paid the rant - No the deposit, $8.
My master was then out. That ma noon.
the date. I cannot give even
dannot
roximato
shink it was the 4 m. 12 d. (17th May).
I saw the MAD
paid the deposit again, 30 subsequent occasions.
* COLLES
The room was compied by the party for about a month.
The ream has been let sines tu
of our fekis vi
a foreign dress tailor, only 3 days ago.
till then »
It was vacan
A statement was first taken from you abou$
YoR.
You were slow that photograph (Rah. ắt }
abores Ech. 36 only and not
MA
That was not the only statomi that I made to
The C. D. I. took a statement from me later.
The one è weeks ago was the fire; statement.
* Court
The photograph was produced se me while I was
making the statement.
(204)