27
admissible. Crow endeavours to prove complicity in Orime A,by
bstablishing complicity in Orime B. Same contentio by Assistant
Attorney General before Magistrate. This videos calculated to
prejudice prisoner with Jury. If relevant,relevanoy must be con
firmed to appropriate issues.Reads; Lindsell,s speech(1.9 ao.).
Any intention to kill in mind of scoused irrelemnt witil he is
ehemi aliunde to be Lu's principal. Would aubmit samý argument
if secusod had been indicted for "murder".
Lindsell+8(speech p.16) went before Magistrate with Zimmer and
Christie's evidence alo:19. (P.81) must have been he &o." A general
invitation to Jury to realy for all issues upon the 2 a 0.evidence.
Cheldon ́s uldress to Jury(fuml), Contains language of nrejudice.
Summing up : Judge adopted Crown view.
(C.J. R. Point 1(9):"This relates to possible misdirection in
summing up and was reserved, subject to it being open in law to me to reserve it")
Judge puts evidence of Zimmern & Christie,na a whole to Jury.
(0.5. Evidence used to prove (a) motive and (b) agmoy)
Adjourned.
Resumed, 2.30 p.m.
Potter r #UN98;-
R2: L22 W
9 Hulabury pp.380, 381. 6.740, 8.742.
13 Halabury. P.43",P.438. $.609. P.439.8.011. P.447.8.621 •
Instruction to Leu prior to 20th March(date of 2 & 0.evidenos).
Archbold: 28th,sition;P.565 «Evidence which may not be given"
£180 P.370,P.1. "R.v.Buckley" 18 Cox 295(Verdict:"Not guilty").
R.v.01swea" 4 0 & P.901.
13 Halsbury pp.481,482,453.8.rgr. 8.age(proof of agmoy);8.627.
Asst: Law of video "10th Ed.5.453 à 458. 11th.Ed.pp.428,430.
*00-inoid seo" is not evidenos. (G.J.:*Not evidee if Ros gestue-
Zimmóri & Christie's evideos"). 13 Halsbury p.420 8.585 "Rea
gestsa", "Porking, v„Jeffrey" (1918) 2.K.8.702.
«Makin.v.A.G.OP N.8.4." (1894) A.0.57.
*F.v.Bond* (1900) 2.K.B.389.
Adjourned.