shin no
reply to 2.5. 46.
"/"
(4) I can not see any delay by the W.D.
In reens of the terms of the A.M. letter
views of
reason
for this
neply
4
? Ask Wo ref (6) when a
may be expected to (2)
Z,.བ
4.11.32
I think it is the vicle in the WO. Lands Brauch
never to answer a letter if they can forcibly delay,
Hlalder
4.11.3 utove
To W.O
Cons
DESTROYED UNDER STATUTE
reply to (2) abuts. reminders
ICAO
lincire
2.1.33.
Sir SSaneburgh
I can only suggest that Sir
Should write to Sert. Greedy
as he did in
the case of the Aerial Ropeway (17) on 92608)
X
In that case it was also the Lands Brauch which
was concerned in the delay.
Wulder
Oft conson.
3·1·33
나
3.1.33