It is clear from the minutes under (II:
on 32937/31 that the decision to instruct the
Covernor to deport hoc to Indo-China was
taken by Lord assfield on the merits of the
case as they were then seen, and that there
is no ground for holding the rench Lovt. or
the .0. responsible for that decision. here
is, therefore, no basis for any claim against
either, even if there were the remotest chance
of any such claim Leing admitted. „e can,
therefore, only reply as proposed.
I would not send any further instruct ions
to the Covernor, who has sufficient guidance
in our telegram no. (51) No doubt les rs light
and ulton have reported to Choc s lawyers in
Hong kong the result of their endeavours in
this country. It will be enough to send the
correspondence to overnor proposed.
Con!
# Rlowell
72. LoC Code (26)
مصر
18.11.320
Jrs 18/11/32
73. to OKC Conl) (Wed(265) All.
61,63,64,65,
66,67,68,71/
at me
25
ᄑ
J2.
280
1