(Cap. 328.)

A281

(Cap. 245, sub. leg.)

A282

Transitional provisions.

Ord. No. 64/67.

PUBLIC ORDER

56. Any permit issued under Part II of the repealed Public Order
Ordinance allowing the person to whom it was issued to enter and leave a
closed area shall, if it is in force at the com- mencement of this
Ordinance, be deemed to have been issued under section 37.

This printed impression has been carefully compared by me with the Bill
which passed the Legislative Council on the 15th day of November, 1967,
and is found by me to be a true and correctly printed copy of the said
Bill,

(Secretariat CR 3285/57)

D. BARTON. Deputy Clerk of Councils.

(9069) Dd.032652 3m 2/67 G.W.B.Ltd. Gp.863

PARLIAMENTARY QUESTION

NON

for ORAL answer on

950

Hory Kone den

The draft reply should reach the Parliamentary Office through your
Under-Secretary by

Now

بجينا

W

on www.17/1

La* Mr. Frank Allaun (Salford, East): To ask the

Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, whether he will
amend the Hong Kong Public Order Ordinance so as to place the burden of
proof upon the authorities; and in what circumstances the Ordinance is
now intended to be used.

19 December, 1968.

π. Lazeram Linerlock

In the case of all offences constituted under the Public

Order Ordinance a burden of proof rests on the prosecution.

When firend is

The

, however, examining certain provisions of the Ordinance,

in consultation with the Governor, in the light of criticism6

that have been made. The Crdinance forms part of the permanent

law of Hong Kong and is used as circumstances require.

19/2 Low

Hi Baulay

Reference

with E

The latest fatos should

volume;

the

jo

on a mu

the P.Q. has gone forward to

Parliamentary Office

reloned

in due court,

a will be

I think

K.I.U New Vot n when the old

we need

a

as will.

When

при

Cars for

Vor A

ordinance have house. Wike file is up to date phrase

labey off fit rebond pass to Mt Smith for

fila

Lake 6 Kibrer

&

ఉమ

ما

билет

to go by saving dispatch

asting if

عمنا

theg

will let us Reas what

вело

mached

in prefaring

to amend

stage a dofft Bill

منا

Order

the

Public

Ordinance, on the lines pupored

in Bo

Che

and

S

42

anclosure

to

Mu Roberts' letto of of February, 1968,

to

ما

M. Gordon Smith.

ARLE

18. 12, 68.

451

Written AnswTES

19 DECEMBER 1968

Commonwealth Economic and

Trading Organjšation

· Mr. Molloy asked the Secretary of State for Foreign And Commonwealth
Affairs if he will consider initiating a pro- posal for the
establishment of a perman ent British Commonwealth Economic and Trading
Organisation.

Mr. Whitlock : No.

What can usefully be done is already dealt with through the Commonwealth
Sectariat and the Commonwealth Economic Consultative Committee,

/HR:

Hong Kong Peblic Order Ordinance

Mr. Frank Allaun asked the Secretary of State for Foreign and
Commonwealth Affairs whether he will amend the Hong Kong Public Oider
Ordinance so as to place the burden of proof upon the autho rities and
in what circumstances the Ordinance is now intended to be used.

Mr. Whitlock: In the case of all offences constituted under the Public
Order Ordinance a burden of proof rests on the prosecution. My right
hon. Friend js, however, examining certain provisions of the Ordinance,
in consultation with the Governor, in the light of criticisms that have
been made. The Ordinance forms part of the permanent law of Hong Kong
and is used as circumstances require.

Convention on the Elimination of All

Forms of Rac ́ol Discrimination

Mr. Atthur Davidson asked the Secre- tary of State for Foreign and
Common- wealth Affairs when the United Kingdom will ratify the
Convention on the Elimin- ation of All Forms Racial Discrimina- tion.

Mr. Goronyy Roberts: I hope we will be in a position to deposit our
Instru- ment of Ratification of this Convention with the Secretary
General of the United Nations early in the New Year. Natións

TRANSPORT

The Borders (Report)

72. Mr. David Steel asked the Minister of Transport (1) whether,
following publi cation of the report, Transport in the

* R 2

report,

D

Written Answers

Borders, a copy of which has been seŋf to hin. he will make a statement
on his picy on these matters;

2) what revenue gure he assumed W on calculong that a social grant of
£20,000 would be needed to retain a Howick Edinburgh passenger rail ser
vice; on how many trains cach way per day the figure was calculated and
on has many passengers per day :

13) to what extent interest charges on past investiment were mcluded in
his cost figure when calculating the fecial grant nected to retain all
or part of the Waverley Line ;

whether he will indicate in the Official RipORT the nature of the repre-
sentations he received about the future of the Waverley Line from the
Scottish Transport Users Consultative Committee. the Scottish Council
Defelopment and Industry) and the Church and Nation Committee of the
Church of Scotland. respectively:

(5) in considering the closure of the Edinburgh-Hawick-Carlisle railway
line, what study was made of the possibility of re-routing all
Edinburgh-London, Euston, traffic on to this line; and by how much it
was estimated such a step would reduce the annual deficit on the
operation of the line

(6) whether he will have immediate discussions with British Railways
about the findings and recommendations con- cerning the relations
between his depart- ment and the Railways Board in the report. Transport
in the Borders, a copy of which has been sent to him;

(7) what recommendations were made to him by the Borders Economic
Consul- tative Group about the closure of the Edinburgh-Hawick-Carlisle
railway:

(8) what information he obtained, before approving the closure of the
line. as to the annual revenue from freight carried on the
Edinburgh-Hawick-Carlisle railway line to and from places on the

line/to route, and through this route, respec- tively, in each of the
last five years :

(9) before coming to a decision to approve closure of the line, what
informa- tion he obtained as to how many days in each of the last five
years the Edinburgh- Hawick Carlisle railway line was used as a relief
route for traffic diverted from other formal routes; and what revenue to

19 Dec 1968.

COL. 457 W

VOL. 7.75

Q1 A

sent b

Hong

в

241

CONFIDENTIAL

SAVING DESPATCH

HKK 14/15

From the Secretary of State for Foreign

and Commonwealth Affairs

To the Officer Administering the Government

of HONG KONG

Date 20 December 1968

No. 711

2.

Public Order Ordinance

Our Saving Despatch 406 of 27 June.

We should be grateful to know what stage has been reached in preparing a
draft Bill to amend the Public Order Ordinance on the lines proposed in
the above Saving Despatch and in the enclosure to Mr. Robert's letter of
16 February 1968 to Mr. Gordon- Smith.

t

R.F

Bree

I

Registry

No. HKK 14/15

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Secret.

Confidential.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

бол

DRAFT

To:-

1

Saving desfatch Type 1+ 5

OAG.

Hong Kong

No 911

DATE 2018 December 1968

From

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

Public Order Ordinance

Our saving despatch 406 of

27 June.

2.

We should be grateful to

J

know what stage has been reached

in preparing the

a

draft Bill to

amend the Public Order Ordinance

on the lines proposed in the above saving despatch and in the

enclosure to

Mr. Robert's letter

(42) of 16 February 1968 to Mr

Prew Gordon- Smith

#519 12

Ed. (3746)

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

:

T

CONFIDENTIAL

CYPHER/CAT A

ROUTINE FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

ILEGRAM NUMBER

1669

TO HONG KONG

19 DECEMBER 1968. (HKK 1/12)

CONFIDENTIAL.

YOUR TELEGRAM NO 2276.

SEPARATE CONFINEMENT.

THANK YOU FOR THIS INFORMATION.

GRATEFUL TO RECEIVE, AS SOON AS THEY CAN BE PROVIDED, THE STATISTICS
REFERRED TO IN LATTER PART OF YOUR PARAGRAPH 1(2)(A) SINCE THE MINISTER
HAS UNDERTAKEN TO LET R ALLAUN HAVE THIS INFORMATION AS

SOON AS POSSIBLE.

STEWART.

FILES

HONG KONG DEPT. FAR EASTERN DEPT. NEWS DEPT.

MR. MORETON

NNNNN

RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No. 31 - 1 JAN 1969.

HKIL 14/15

LAST

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

CYPHER/CAT A

ROUTINE HONG KONG

NO 2287

TO FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

23 DEC 1968.

CONFIDENTIAL.

YOUR TELEGRAM 1669.

6

I CONFIRM THAT SEPARATE CONFINEMENT HAS NOT SO FAR BEEN AWARDED TO

ANY PRISONER CONVICTED OF OFFENCES ARISING OUT OF THE 1967
DISTURBANCES

IR D. TRENCH

PILES

HONG KONG DEPT.

F. EAST, D. NEWS DEPT. 14. MORETON

NICKY/2S

CONFIDENTIAL

.

Hong Kong A4

1535

C.8. 201

2600100

100×106-11/62-1332005

5m

6-1-69

CONFIDENTIAL

bm the governer Hori

SAVINGRAM DESPATCH

& Commonwealth Affairs

To the Secretary * T****Ed Gde¥ K Koh

Repeated to:-

No....

4

No.

No.....

Heated to:-

Date

3.

My Reference

January, 1969. CR 3285/5711

Your Reference.......

וויו

&

Your saving despatch No. 406 of 27th June, 1968.

Public Order Ordinance.

I enclose two copies of a draft Public Order
(Amendment) Bill MAT together with an Explanatory Memorandum and the
Attorney General's

Comments. The criticisms of the Public Order Ordinance made by the Hong
Kong Branch of Justice have been taken into account and where possible
incorporated in the draft Bill, as have the contents of your saving
despatch No. 406.

2.

I should be grateful, however, to learn whether, in the
light of the further views set out in paragraphs 3, 7, 11 and 12 of the
Attorney General's Comments, you would be prepared to reconsider your
earlier advice on these aspects. You will note that, although in the
case of paragraphs 7 and 11 amendments on the lines you suggested have
been included in the Bill, I would greatly prefer to omit them as I
consider the Commissioner of Police's views have force. In the case of
paragraphs 3 and 12 no amendments have been included.

30

You will also wish to note that the Bill provides for the repeal of
section 49 of the Ordinance. This section's wide powers of entry and
search without warrant have attracted adverse comment.

4.

I should be grateful for your early comments on the
Bill, which I would like to introduce in the Legislative Council as soon
as possible.

IML/mjc

RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES NO. 31

- 7 JAN 1969

HKK14/15

CONFIDENTIAL

(50) Price

1

.22

A BI LL

To

Amend the Public Order Ordinance and to make consequential

amendments to the Trade Union Registration Ordinance.

Enacted by the Governor of Hong Kong, with the advice and

consent of the Legislative Council thereof.

Short title.

1. This Ordinance may be cited as the Public Order (Amendment)

Ordinance 1968.

Amendment of section 2. (Cap. 245).

2.

Section 2 of the principal Ordinance is amended by

deleting the definition of "meeting" and substituting the following

""meeting" means

(a) any gathering or assembly of persons convened or

organized for any purpose; and

(b) any gathering or assembly of persons, whether or

not previously convened or organized, at which

any person assumes or attempts to assume control

or leadership thereof,

but does not include any gathering or assembly of persons

convened or organized exclusively

(i) for the purposes of any public body; or

(ii) for the purpose of carrying out any duty or

exercising any power imposed or conferred by any

Ordinance;"

Amendment of section 3.

3. Section 3 of the principal Or dinance is amended

-

(a) in subsection (1) by deleting "if the display of any flag,

banner or emblem is, in the opinion of such police officer,

2

likely to cause or lead to a breach of the peace" and

Bubstituting the following -

"if such police officer reasonably believes that the

display of any flag, banner or emblem is likely to

cause or lead to a breach of the peace";

(b) in subsection (2) by inserting, before "necessary" in the

first place where it occurs, the following -

"reasonably".

Amendment of seotion 7.

4.

Section 7 of the principal Ordinance is amended -

(a) in subsection (2), by inserting after "procession" in the

second place where it occurs the following

-

"(or two days before a public procession solely

for the purposes of a funeral)",;

(b) in subsection (5) -

-

(1) by deleting "or" at the end of paragraph (b);

(ii) by deleting the full stop at the end of paragraph (c)

and substituting a semicolon; and

(111) by inserting thereafter the following new paragraphs -

+

(Cap. 132)

"(a) any public meeting held exclusively for

social purposes in any restaurant licensed

under the Public Health and Urban Services

Ordinance; or

(e)

any public meeting solely for the purpose

of a funeral,".

As dment of secti 9.

- 3 -

5. Section 9 of the principal Ordinance is amended

(a) by inserting after "to the final dispersal thereof," the

following -

"unless he is prevented from being so present by

reason of illness or other unavoidable cause,"}

(b)

by deleting "and the period of one hour imediately following

the final dispersal thereof

Amendment of section 11.

6. Section 11 of the principal Ordinance is amended in

subsection (2) by deleting "if the same is causing or is in his

opinion" and substituting the following

Amendment of section 12.

"if he reasonably believes that the same is".

7. Section 12 of the principal Ordinance is amended -

(a)

in subsection (2) by deleting paragraph (a) and substituting

the following

"(a) any public meeting or public procession for which

a licence is required under section 7 takes place

without such a licence;"

(b) in subsection (3) by inserting in paragraph (a) after

"assembly" the following -

", unless he proves that he did not know that it was

an unlawful assembly".

Amendment of section 14.

8. Section 14 of the principal Ordinance is amended in

subsection (1) by deleting "otherwise than in pursuance of lawful

authority" end cubstituting the following

-

"without lawful authority or reasonable excuse".

Amendment of section 15.

9. Section 15 of the principal Ordinance is amended in

subsection (3) by inserting efter "Any person who" the following

', after notice of a prohibition under subsection (1) has

been given,".

Amendment of section 18.

10. Section 18 of the principal Ordinance is amended -

(a) in subsection (1) -

(i) by inserting, before "manner", the following -

"disorderly";

(ii) by deleting "such assembly" and substituting the

following -

"such conduct";

(b) in subsection (3) by deleting "unlawful assembly" in the

first place where it occurs and substituting therefor the

following -

"assembly which is an unlawful assembly by virtue of

subsection (1)".

Amendment of section 23.

11. Section 23 of the principal Ordinance is amended by deleting
subsection (2) and substituting the following

5-

W

"(2) Nothing in this section shall make it an offence

for a person to enter upon his own premises if they are in

his possession or in the custody of his servant or agent.".

!

Amendment of section 25.

Section 25 of the principal Ordinance is amended by deleting

"a fight" and substituting therefor the following -

-

Amendment of section 26,

"an unlawful fight".

13. Section 26 of the principal Ordinance is amended by deleting

"or io likely" and substituting the following -

"or which he knows or ought to know is likely".

Amendment of Part V.

14. Part V of the principal Ordinance is amended in the heading

by deleting "AND INTIMIDATING ASSEMBLIES".

Repeal and replacement

of section 27.

15. Section 27 of the principal Ordinance is repealed and

replaced by the following -

"Intimidation.

27. (1) Any person who, with a view to

compelling any other person to abstain from doing

or to do any act which such other person has a

right to do or abstain from doing, without lawful

authority or reasonable excuse

(a) uses violence to or intimidates such

other person or his wife or children,

or injures his property;

(b)

persistently follows such other person

about from place to place;

(c) hides any tools, clothes or other property

owned or used by such other person, or

deprives him of them or hinders him in

--- 6 -

the use of them;

(a) follows such other person in a disorderly

manner in or through any street or road;

(e) watches or besets the house or other place

where such other person resides or works

or carries on business or happens to be

or the approaches to such house or place; or

(f) blocks or causes an obstruction in any

street or road,

shall be guilty of an offence.

(2) Any person who, without lawful authority

or reasonable excuse, does or says anything, or

hehaves in a manner, or utters or distributes any

publication, which is likely to make some other person

apprehensive as to what may happen

(a) to such other person or to any member of

the family or any dependent of such other

person;

(b) to any property, business, undertaking or

interest of such other person or of any

member of the family or any dependant

of such other person;

(c) to any building or place occupied by

such other person or by any member of

the family or any dependant of such

other person; or

Repeal of section 28.

16.

- 7·

(a) to any business or undertaking in which such

other person or cny member of the family or

any dependant of such other person is employed,

shall be guilty of an offence.

(3) Any person guilty of an offence under this

Share This Page