PRACTICAL SUPPORT OR ENCOURAGEMENT FROM PEKING BEYOND NEWSPAPER

ARTICLES AND BROADCASTS. ALL-OUT PEKING SUPPORT, OR INDEED

INSPIRATION, OF DISORDERS FOLLOWING ON REJECTION OF THEIR PRESENT

OVERTURES WOULD CAUSE PROBLEMS OF A VERY DIFFERENT MAGNITUDE.

5. AGAINST THIS BACKGROUND I AM CONCERNED ABOUT THE PROGRAMME

CONTAINED IN YOUR TELEGRAM NO. 39 FOR RE-CONSIDERATION BY THE

BOARD OF REVIEW OF SENTENCES. WE HAVE ALREADY PASSED THE SPRING

FESTIVAL DATE, BUT COULD THE BOARD NOT GET DOWN TO BUSINESS /FORT!WITH

2

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

FORTHWITH WITHOUT VIOLATING YOUR CRITERIA OF RELEASES AT OUR OWN

RACE AND FOR OUR OWN DELIBERATE AND EXPLAINABLE REASONS? IF THEY

DID I WOULD HOPE THAT IT MIGHT BE POSSIBLE FOR YOU TO TAKE

DECISIONS WITHIN THE NEXT MONTH, WHICH WOULD EFFECT THE RELEASE

OF AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OF THE 24 YOU MENTION AS BEING UNDER

CONSIDERATION BECAUSE THEIR SENTENCES MAY HAVE INCLUDED AN

EXEMPLARY ASPECT, PLUS PERHAPS THE FEMALE PRISONERS, PLUS THE ONE OR TWO
WHO ARE DUE OUT ANYHOW. I HOPE THAT TAKING INTO ACCOUNT

PARAGRAPH 4 ABOVE YOU WILL FEEL ABLE TO ACHIEVE THIS. THE CHINESE

WILL BE LOOKING CLOSELY AT OUR ACTIONS AND THE ABSENCE OF ANY

RESPONSE BY US AT THE TIME OF THE SPRING FESTIVAL MIGHT WELL MAKE

IT HARDER FOR THE CALMER COUNSELS AT PRESENT IN EVIDENCE IN PEKING

TO PREVAIL. YOU MIGHT PERHAPS SEE ADVANTAGE IN ARRANGING YOUR

REVIEW PROCEDURE IN SUCH A WAY THAT PRISONERS WOULD BE RELEASED

IN A STEADY STREAM AS THEIR CASES WERE DEALT WITH BY THE BOARD.

THIS WOULD HELP US TO PLAY THE CHINESE ALONG, AND TO KEEP THE
TEMPERATURE DOWN, AND GIVE TIME FOR FULLER CONSIDERATION OF THE

FUTURE PROGRAMME OF RELEASES.

6. | RECOGNISE THAT YOU MAY FEEL THAT YOU WILL HAVE TO TAKE YOUR

EXECUTIVE COUNCIL WITH YOU ON THIS, BUT I WOULD HOPE THAT BY USING

MY ARGUMENTS YOU WOULD BE ABLE TO CONVINCE THEM THAT THE ACTION

I PROPOSE WOULD IN THE LONG-TERM AND WIDER CONTEXT BE OF GREATER

VALUE TO THE COLONY THAN KEEPING THESE PEOPLE LOCKED UP.

DOUGLAS-HOME

FILES

FED

HKD

PRIVATE SECRETARY

SIR L MONSON

SIR S TOMLINSON

MR WILFORD

PS TO MR ROYLE FS TO PUS

3

CONFIDEFTI, AL

FFFFF

хх

Registry No.

DEPARTMENT

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION. PRIORITY MARKINGS

Top Secret

Secret

Restricted Unafasified

fair.

En Clair. Obde

Cypher

Draft Telegram to:-

HONG KONG

No..

(Date)

And to:-

82.

* Date and time (G.M.T.) telegram should

reach addressee(s)

(Date)

Despatched

Emergency Immediate j

Routine

24/1/21

6137:

Security classification | CONFIDENTIAL 8 11002

-if any

[Codeword-if any).

Addressed to HONG KONG (Immediate)

.....(date).............

יו

.....

L...

telegram No..

28/1

And to.......

repeated for information to

PEKING (Personal for Denson)

-4

-...

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Saving to.......

...

- L

TILL

IIIII'IL L

יוייײ

Repeat to:-

PEKING

Saving to:-

Distribution:-

Flex FED H.K.D.

SSL.Main

Sa Sīmlen

Copies to: -

P.S.

P.S, KM: Rayle PS. KP.U.S.

1.

Personal for Governor,

CONFRONTATION PRISONERS.

On my return from Singapore I have been able

to re-consider this question on the basis of the

valuable advice contained in your telegrams Nos. 13,

17 and 36 and Peking telegram No. 42. I should

like you to be in no doubt that I do not see Sino-

British relations in isolation from the interests

of Hong Kong and that it was primarily my estimate

of the long-term interest of Hong Kong which prompted

my telegram No. 24. I should also like to assure

you that there is no question whatever of our being

under some sort of an obligation to the Chinese to

do a deal about the confrontation prisoners. The

Chinese have persistently sought to connect this

issue with the release of British subjects detained

in China. Fe have, however, retained and still do

retain complete freedom of action.

2. Our assessment of the present attitude of the

Chinese Government is based on evidence from a

variety of sources and is reinforced by Mr. Denson's

telegram No. 42. There can be no certainty in

CONFIDENTIAL

/these

CONFIDENTIAL

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

these matters, but there is a real risk that if there is no sign

of movement in regard to the confrontation prisoners the Chinese
Government will sooner or later (and probably sooner) begin to

cause trouble and in this context trouble means in the first

place trouble for Hong Kong. At the same time, the indications are

that the Chinese Government want to liquidate this issue rather

than to make public capital out of it and are therefore unlikely to

crow unduly about it and perhaps even to discourage their adherents

in Hong Kong from doing so if we do decide that it is in our own

best interest to go some way to meet them. This is borne out by

the unobtrusive way in which they have made their representations in
Hong xong, coupled with the manner in which they have spoken to us

both here and in Peking.

3. I am

I am, of course, giving the most serious consideration to the

views which you have urged upon me about the danger to the security of
the Colony and the strength of feeling of "all strata of public

opinion" if you were to pursue the course set out in my telegram

No. 24.

1.

At the same time I cannot but be concerned about the threat

which the Chinese could, and in my view might well, pose to the

Colony if we show that we are unwilling to move other than at a

very slow pace. You say in paragraph 2 of your telegram No. 17

that "our only real defence has always been to show clearly that the

Communiste cannot usurp our essential authority except by the use

of a degree of violence which will ruin Hong Kong's usefulness to

then" But must we not recognise that the Chinese Government could

+

put Hong Kong to a very considerable degree of inconvenience without

necessarily taking matters to extremes?

We must also remember

that in 1967/68 the Hon. Kong Government benefitted from the fact

that the trouble-makers enjoyed little practical support or
encouragement from Peking beyond newspaper articles and broadcasts.
All-out Peking support, or indeed inspiration, of disorders following on
rejection of their present overtures would cause

problems of

ery different magnitude.

offvery

15.

IDAS $.$

CONFIDENTIAL

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

CONFIDENTIAL

5. Against this background I am concerned about

the programme contained in your telegram No. 30

for re-consideration by the Board of Review of

sentences. We have already passed the Spring

Festival date, but could the Board not get down

to business forthwith without violating your

criteria of releases at our own pace and for our

own deliberate and explainable reasons? If they

did I would hope that it might be possible for

you to take decisions within the next month,

which would effect the release of as many as pos8- ible of the 24 you
mention as being under conside

ration because their sentences may have included

an exemplary aspect, plus perhaps the female

prisoners, plus the one or two who are due out

anyhow. If this could be acipleved I would hop

that we would thereafter be able to maintain the

resentus of Récelonated releases. I very much

hope that taking into account paragraph 4 above

you will feel able to achieve this. The Chinese

will be looking closely at our actions and the

absence of any response by us at the time of the

Spring Festival might well make it harder for the

calmer counsels at present in evidence in Peking

to prevail. You might perhaps see advantage

in arranging your Review Procedure in such a way

that prisoners would be released in a steady

stream as their cases were dealt with by the Board. This would help us
to play the Chinese along, and

to keep the temperature down, and give time for fuller consideration of
the futura programme if releases 6. I recognise that you may feel that
you will have to take your Executive Council with you on this, but I
would hope that by using my arguments you would be able to convince them
that the

CONFIDENTIAL

/action

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

action I propose would in the long-term and wider

context be of greater value to the Colony than

keeping these people locked up.

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Far Eastern Department

SECRET

FED

239 19

pw.

interpa

SM

261

Hong Kong Prisoners

The Secretary of State has minuted on Peking telegram No. 42 of 16
January as follows:

2.

"I would like a word about this in the Office. I am inclined to think
that the balance of interest lies in releasing some prisoners now.
A.D.H. 23/1"

I believe that a submission is on its way to the Secretary of State
about this. Provisionally we could have a meeting at 4.15 p.m. on
Wednesday, 27 January. I should be grateful if recipients of this minute
could attend in the Secretary of State's room at the House of Commons.

c.c.

P.S. to Mr. Royle P.U.S.,

Sir S. Tomlinson

Sir L. Monson

Grall

(J. A. N. Graham)

25 January, 1971

pla

Mr. Wilford

Mr. Leahy

Hong Kong Department

I submit two draft telegrams in the light of the Secretary of State's
meeting. They have been agreed with Sir L Konson, Sir S Tomlinson and Mr
Morgan.

Kim halford

K M Wilford

27 January 1971

Telegrams 1/28/1

sayed

Mr. Legen Private Secretary

Copies to:

PUS

SECRET

Sir S Tomlinson Sir L Monson Mr Leahy

Mr Morgan (FED)

Hong Kong Dept

FRIORITY

CYPHER CAT A

P HONG KONG 262913Z

CONFIDENTIAL◄

10P COPY

من

CONFIDENTIAL

FEH 14/1

TO PRIORITY F.C.0. TELNO. 54 OF 26 JANUARY 1971

ROUTINE INFO PEKING

PEKING TELEGRAM NO. 58 TO YOU.

19

CONFRONTATION PRISONERS: LUNAR NEW YEAR.

pl.

A SECOND LETTER FROM '* FAMILY REPRESENTATIVES OF PATRIOTIC

COMPATRIOTS IN JAIL? WAS DELIVERED AS UNOBTRUSIVELY AS THE FIRST (KY
TELEGRAM NO. 89% OF 1972) AT THE COLONIAL SECRETARIAT ON

25 JANUARY. IT ASKS FOR THE 'RELEASE OF CUR KIN STILL IN PRISON SO THAT
THEY MAY RE-UNITE WITH THEIR FAMILIES TO CELEBRATE THE FESTIVAL.''

2. THE PRESS HERE HAVE GOT WIND CF ENQUIRIES MADE BY PROBATION OFFICERS
ABOUT THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF CONFRONTATION PRISONERS BEING

CONSIDERED FOR RELEASE. TODAY'S UNDERLINE NEXT THREE WORDS

HONG KONG STANDARD REPORTS THAT TWO DOZEN CASES WILL BE SURVITTED

TO THE PRISONS BOARD OF REVIEW NEXT MONTH. THE LOCAL COMMUNISTS WILL
PROBABLY DEDUCE CORRECTLY FROM THIS, AND MAY REPORT TO PEKING,

THAT SOMETHING IS MOVING BUT THAT RELEASES CANNOT BE EXPECTED

BEFORE LUNAR NEW YEAR WHICH IS CELEBRATED ON 27 JANUARY.

TRENCH

FILES

FED

HKD

GIPD

IRD

PUSD

NEWS DEPT

FRIVATE SECRETARY

PUS

PS TO MR ROYLE

SIR S TOMLINSON.

STR L MONSON MR WILFORD

FFFFF

REPEATED AS REQUESTED_7

CONFIDENTIAL

L

IMEDIATE

SECRET

17

CYPHER CAT A

TOP COPY

FM PEKING 2263267.

SECRET

TO IMMEDIATE F C O TELNO 58 OF 22 JANUARY INFO PRIORITY HONG

KONG (PERSONAL FOR GOVERNOR).

HONG KONG TELNO 36 TO F C 0.

کا

AT A RECEPTION LAST NIGHT I WAS TACKLED BY T'ANG HAI-

KUANG ABOUT HONG KONG PRISONERS. HE SAID THAT THE CHINESE

GOVERNMENT HOPED THAT WE WOULD FIND IT POSSIBLE FOR SOME OF THEM

TO BE REUNITED WITH THEIR FAMILIES FOR CHINESE NEW YEAR, 1 MADE

A NONCOMMITAL RESPONSE AND SOUGHT TO TERMINATE THE CONVERSATION.

BUT T'ANG PURSUED THE QUESTION WITH CONSIDERABLE TENACITY AND

IT WAS CLEAR THAT WHAT HE WISHED TO CONVEY WAS THAT WE SHOULD

MATCH THE CHINESE GESTURE OF RELEASING JOHNSTON BEFORE CHRISTMAS

WITH SOME GESTURE IN HONG KONG, AS I HAVE SAID BEFORE, THERE

MAY WELL BE DIFFERENCES WITHIN THE CHINESE GOVERNMENT ABOUT THE

CONDUCT OF RELATIONS WITH US IN PARTICULAR OVER HONG KONG AND THAT

THOSE WHO FAVOUR A POLICY OF DETENTE MAY BE UNDER PRESSURE FROM

THOSE WHO WANT GREATER TOUGHNESS. T'ANG'S INITIATIVE SEEMS

TO SUPPORT THIS VIEW, AND ARGUES IN FAVOUR OF A POLICY OF

GRADUATED RELAXATION.

DENSON

7ILES:

\TED AS REQUESTED).

FED

HKD

GIPD

IRD.

FUSD

NEWS DETT

PS

IR G. ORAL FORD PS/R. ROYLE

SIR S. TOMLINSON

MIR L. NONSON

MR. WILFORD

SECRET

26/

Kr Wilford

Sir S Tomlingón

Sir L Mopson

Mr Løg an

Priv

Private Secretary

COVERING SECRET

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFRONTATION PRISONERS IN HONG KONG

enterpa

SM

28.1

+19(16

B

ف)

C & DCS

E

A &

F

سلام

1. The Governor's reactions to the Secretary of State's

telegram No 24 have now been received (Hong Kong Teb Nos 13,

17 and 36). We also have the views of Peking

(Peking Tel No 42).

2. This Department's considered assessment remains, now

firmly supported by Mr Denson, as in the Secretary of State's

telegram (my submission of 31 December) that it is in the long-

term interests of Hong Kong for a gesture now to be made to

the Chinese. From Hong Kong Tel No 30 it appears that the

moves the Governor contemplates taking would not constitute an

adequate gesture. Indeed from his figures it seems that there

would be only 2 "exemplary" cases who would qualify for more

than a few months' remission. The Chinese have made it clear

that an "adequate" gesture would be the release of 41 of the

remaining 73.

3. The Governor clearly needs some reassurance that the

action we have suggested is based on our assessment of the

long-term interests of Hong Kong and that we do not see

CONFIDENTIAL

COVERING SECRET

1 -

+

A

CONFIDENTIAL

Sino-British relations in isolation from those interests.

4.

The Governor has asked for consultation and I recommend

that we discover what he has in mind. I have misgivings

about this proposal as it could result in further speculation

about "rifts" between HMG and the Hong Kong Government.

5. I recommend that we accept the Governor's general

conclusion (paragraph 5 of his Tel No 36) that we should

"aim for releases at our own pace and for our own deliberate

and explainable reasons". I would hope nevertheless that

the Secretary of State would agree to express the hope that

the careful scrutiny the Governor is personally giving would

result in the numbers eligible for release being nearer to

those the Secretary of State mentioned in his original

telegram.

6. A draft telegram in this sense is submitted.

await the Secretary of State's return.

It can

شا

SALMugen

J AL Morgan

Far Eastern Department K 255

19 January 1971

Copy to: Hong Kong Dept (Mr Laird)

CONFIDENTIAL

- 2.

-

/The Governor's

CONFIDENTIAL

1. The Governor's telegrams Nos. 13 and 17, the latter in

particular, use some extremely strong language. I am, however,

very loath to accept his argumentation, particularly in view of

the reiterated position of Mr. Denson, which supports the views

expressed by the Secretary of State in FCO telegram No. 24. If

the Governor gets his way the result is almost certain to be that

virtually none of the prisoners in jail will be released more

than a month or two ahead of their normal release date if they

earn full remission. We shall get no credit for this from the

Chinese and there remains the serious risk that the Chinese will

stir up trouble of some kind in Hong Kong. Once that occurs it

will be much more difficult to arrange accelerated releases.

2. I agree therefore with Mr. Morgan that we should go back to

the Governor, but I have prepared a rather longer draft telegram

than the one originally submitted by him. He has seen this and

the text is agreed between us.

him. hiffão

K.M. Wilford

To Cousinson

"25/1

22 January 1971

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

A.

I.

The Private Secretary has said the Secretary of State

wishes to discuss this subject at 4.15 p.m. on Wednesday, 27th.

2. I supported the general proposition behind the Secretary of

State's telegram No.24 that a substantial gesture to the Chinese

in these matters was in the long-term interests of Hong Kong and

I had hoped that by private consultation with the Governor we

could bring him to see that.

3. As things have developed since however I have grave doubts

whether such a gesture still remains in the long-term interests of

the Colony. I refer to the ill-timed Press speculation on the

subject and the self-generated mood of apprehension and opposition

that have been created in Hong Kong by this speculation. In the

circumstances wholesale releases could easily turn apprehension

into panic and in that event it is almost inconceivable that the

C.P.G. would not stir up the troubled pot to secure what must be

their most desirable policy aim to reduce Hong Kong to the

same state of puppet-like impotenõe ав Масао. It is one thing

for the Hong Kong security forces to contain communist disturbances

(as they did in 1967) when the population has rallied behind them:

it would be quite a different matter if the population were in

a state of panic and anxiously hedging their bets.

4. If however this view is not accepted, I do not think that

the revised draft is calculated to bring the Governor round to the

contrary view: there is much in it which he will with greater

or less reason resent

-

especially the statement that the question

of confrontation prisoners must be dealt with with the framework

of Britain's relations with China. It must be remembered that

he has been "conditioned"

CONFIDENTIAL

/(1)

CONFIDENTIAL

5.

(1) by ten years' experience as a Colonial Governor in

which he has been accustomed to exercise the delegated power of pardon
"in his own deliberate judgment" against the background of the general
policy, stated in Parliament in 1947 and followed since that "inter-
vention by Her Majesty on the advice of the Secretary of State... would
seriously impair the administration of justice in the Colonies" (Mr.
Creach Jones in the Commons 11 August 1947); and

(11)

by his own views as to the responsibilities of a Governor of Hong Kong
in briefing us on the qualities

-

of a Governor against the background of choosing a successor to himself
he set high on the list of priorities that a Governor should be seen to
be

defending the interests of Hong Kong against all-corners including and
perhaps specially the United Kingdom,

I would prefer to see something on the lines of the original

draft sent with a view to influencing the Governor's judgment towards

more and more speedy releases. It could be strengthened by the

arguments in the revised draft to the effect that we cannot rely on

the Chinese taking a rebuff lying down and therefore a situation very

different from 1967 is on the cards. But on the other hand the draft

does not take account of the weakness in our position caused by the

reaction to the Press speculation.

6. In short my assessment is that whatever we do we run a risk of

serious trouble but our chances of containing it are that much

better if the bulk of the people of Hong Kong reckon we are standing

firm and have not persuaded themselves that we shall give way to

pressure.

I do not believe that there is any significant "middle

CONFIDENTIAL

/ground"

CONFIDENTIAL

ground" of opinion that can be rallied to us. The bulk of the

people will back whom they think is the winner and are likely

in that case to determine the issue of the conflict.

25 January 1971

Copies to:

wind 7 mem

Share This Page