the Governor's views;

Mr. Long must, I think, be based on the assumption that there

will be no fresh moves on our side. In answer to a direct

query on the telephone by Mr. Long on 25 July, I confirmed

that nothing new was in the offing in Hong Kong.

7. Mr. Long's indictment is fourfold.

(a) Our argument that an early release of the Hong Kong

prisoners would greatly reduce the sanction of prison

sentences as a deterrent applies, in his view, with at

least equal validity to the release of the Krogers.

In an attempt to cope with this I have thought it best

SECRET

- 3-

SECRET

to refer with some frankness to the special

circumstances of Hong Kong and the real implications

for the Colony should we concede defeat in this matter

by the Chinese.

(b) Our argument that if the Chinese were successful in

using Mr. Grey as a hostage they might well be encouraged

to try the same thing with other British subjects in

future also applies with equal validity to the release

of the Krogers. It would seem best to leave this

unanswered.

(c) There is no parallel between the deal made over the

Krogers and the proposed deal with the Chinese to release

the Hong Kong prisoners outside the Colony. Mr. Long's

point a subtle one

-

is that in agreeing to release

the Krogers to Poland we were giving the Russians what

they wanted, while in offering to release the newsworkers

to China we knew we were proposing something to which the

Chinese were strongly opposed. There is some validity

in this. But in each case we did offer what was in

effect an exchange; and in an effort to make an exchange

more palatable to the Chinese we showed considerable

flexibility. I have thought it worth reminding Mr. Long

how far we were prepared to go in offering the Chinese

a reasonable solution. This involves setting down the

essence of the arrangements offered to the Chinese through

covert channels earlier this year. I have however

avoided any mention of the channel as such (although

SECRET

SECRET

(a)

8.

Mr. Long has in the past been informed orally of

its existence).

In comparison with Mr. Brooke, Mr. Grey has been

penalised for his fortitude and good sense. I think

we must concede this point, arguing in reply that had

Mr. Grey's health broken down we should have been faced

with an agonising decision; but this fortunately did

not occur and the national interest has been served

accordingly.

There is a further defence which might have been offered

to Mr. Long for our different handling of the Brooke and Grey

cases, but which on balance I have excluded. It is this.

The deal over Mr. Brooke and Mr. Grey covered, as far as I a

aware, all the British subjects in detention in Russia and all

the inmates of our prison in whom the Russians had expressed

interest. Apart from Mr. Grey and the newsworkers, there

are in detention in China a dozen other British subjects,

and in prison in Hong Kong some 230 other communiste whose

premature release the Chinese have been trying to secure.

If we had made a deal over Mr. Grey and the newsworkera, we

have would/come under pressure from the relatives of the other

British subjects and possibly also from the Chinese to go on

making similar deals.

9. There were indications at the end of last week that

Mr. Long might be on the point of mounting a press campaign

criticising our handling of the Grey affair. This has not so

far been the case. I had a telephone conversation with him

SECRET

- 5 -

SECRET

on the evening of 25 July in the course of which I expressed

my anxiety lest public controversy and what would be said

about Chinese attitudes might somehow upset the tacit deal

we now have with the Chinese about Mr. Grey. This may have had

some effect.

10.

Depending in some measure on Mr. Long's reaction to

the reply, I would propose in due course to see the office-

bearers of the Reuters chapel of the National Union of

Journalists, who have kept in touch with us, and explain our

preoccupations.

Copies to: Private Secretary

Mr. Godden

Mr. Baker

Sir L. Monson

Mr. Carter

Mr. Giffard

Mr. Haydon

Humay Jon Money.

(James Murray)

31 July, 1969.

Please also see further minute schon

"A conclusion

1/vi/65

Private Secretary Thasy sagues yo Ho

SECRET

- 6-

REUTERS "haft 29/7

FEX for dift senly have 282

MA 241

927

Private and Confidential

The Rt Hon Michael Stewart CH MP Secretary of State for Foreign and

Commonwealth Affairs

Foreign and Commonwealth Office London SWI

July 25 1969

Dear Mr Stewart

I wrote to you first just over a year ago to ask you to consider an
early release for the newspaper workers imprisoned in Hong Kong in order
to secure the freedom of Anthony Grey. I have renewed that request
several times and I do so again now.

2. You have given in letters and conversations reasons for not releasing
the

newspaper workers, the validity of which was not mine to judge since
these reasons arose from responsibilities which are not mine. Whatever
validity they had, however, has surely been considerably eroded by the
passage of time and I would have thought entirely cancelled out by the
announcement in the House of Commons yesterday that an agreement had
been made with the Soviet Union to exchange two convicted spies for Mr
Gerald Brooke.

> I do not wish to comment on the agreement which has secured Mr
Brooke's

release. I am reminded, however, that in your letter of February 28 this
year you said that an early release of the Hong Kong prisoners would
greatly reduce the sanction of prison sentences as a deterrent and that
if the Chinese were successful in using Mr Grey as a hostage in this way
they might well be encouraged to try the same thing with other British
subjects in the future. Did not both these objections apply with at
least equal validity to the release of the Krogers?

It may be urged that Brooke was ill and under the threat of further
charges. Is Grey to suffer continued detention because he has had the
fortitude to withstand the rigours of imprisonment and the good sense to
give his gaolers no grounds for any charges against him? It might be
thought that Grey's case has the more merit since unlike Brooke, who
knowingly broke Soviet

Gerald Long General Manager Reuters Limited 85 Fleet Street London EC4
Telephone Fleet Street 6060

2

law, he has committed no fault of any kind.

"I cannot accept that there is any parallel between the deal made over
the

Krogers and the proposed deal with the Chinese to release the Hong Kong
prisoners outside the colony. The reasons why I cannot accept this com-
parison are well known to you and I will not go into them here except to
say that the Russians were known to want the release of the Krogers to
Poland while the Chinese were known to refuse the expulsion of Hong Kong
Chinese from the colony.

I am already being asked by Reuter journalists what justification there
is after yesterday for not taking the action which it is known will
bring about Grey's release. No doubt Grey's colleagues throughout Fleet
Street and indeed throughout the world will be asking the same question.
Grey will be asking it himself and may be expected to ask it insistently
when he is released. I can give no answer to this question since I can
myself see no justification.

7 I am compelled to write as I do as Grey's fellow journalist and as the
man

who unknowingly sent him into the situation that was to produce his
detention. I do not believe that Grey should be asked to endure one day
of detention that could be spared him. I ask you to show the same
understanding for Anthony Grey that you have been prepared to show for
Gerald Brooke.

Yours sincerely

Gerald han

10, DOWNING STREET, S.W.1.

PRIVATE SECRETARY

Entera patum ko

618

FE

FOREIGN AND COMMON WEALTH OFFICE

The attached communication addressed to the Prime Minister is
transmitted to you to be dealt with whatever manner is considered
appropriate by the Department concerned. It refers to previous
correspondence which was forwarded to

you en...

J

1. No acknowledgment has been sent from here.

2. A plain acknowledgment has been sent from here, adding that the
communication has been forwarded to your Department.

3. A plain acknowledgment has been sent from here, adding that the
communication is receiving attention. You should ensure that a
substantive reply is sent from your Department as soon as possible.

4. A copy of the acknowledgment which has bebit sent from here is
attached.

Date

4.869

7545 Dd. 667733 10w 1/69 CHC 696

been REGISTRYN CO -7 AUG 1969

Fee 13041

Lig. 12/s at

FCO.

Azz

Dear Sir,

So, Whateley Road,

East Dulwich,

se.aa.

22

30th July, 1969.

R-218

I am

writing

to ade

you

why is

it not possible to get Anthony Grey the Reuters Correspondent, who is
being held in Peking released?

The week before Gerald

before Gerald Brooke

was

allowed to come home, the

Mr. Michael Stewart

Foreign Secretary announced that Mr. Grey

was

going to

މ

be released in October,

when the last Chinese Communist Journalists holding in Hong Kong finish

we are

their Prison sentences.

E

Then, on the day Gerald Brooke returned to this Country, Mr. Stewart
made another statement to the House

Mr Grey

of Commons, saying

e released in October as

ве

hoped.

world not he had

in

Was there a great hue and ary? No Sil, there was not only my room, and I
have no doubt in Anthony Greys Mother's home were the protests heard.

I am

glad you were able to arrange

for Gerald Brookes release, at a price of course, but I cannot feel
great

I do for Mr. Dyompatty for them as I do

for

Grey. After all, Gerald Brooke went to Russia as a

visitor, he broke

مال

3

that

the laws of punished for doing

Country

and was

20

Anthony Grey has broken no kaws

im

very

ma.

He too, is I am sure a

physically and mentally

sick man,

I remember his Mothers words when

she was interviewed on the BBC Radia

one morni

morning

months

ago

"He is a

tough lad, but I don't know how much

more

До

of this he can

stand:

everything being done that it is possible to do to have this poor now
brought home? Must we

by and let them hope?

no

Just stand

go on suffering with

д

am

just

4

one woman

woman,

nearly

a Widow

21 years.

with a son who is

вам

you

please explain to me how

ice when

the woke World couldreforce

men reached the Hoor and walked on

나,

it, and

yer

know that one human

being is left, suffering on this Earth,

as Anil

Anthony Grey is, and do withing

about it.

weep for him and his poor Mother

for them both,

I can only

Я

I pray for

hope you

Sir,

can do more

for

them

than 9.

I know

you

very busy

man, and have so many problems

are a

to solve, but I hope you

is

be able to spare a few

to read

my

letter,

well

moments

Yours truly, Maureen Wooden.

на

noi la Hull Road,

M 4/8 betting han.

FED to reply be

A. Micheal Stewart. Im P.

10

Fareign Serretay.

4/7/ Parlante

до

-London

REG...

ماء

- 7 AUG 1969

FEC indi

Yorks

(921)

Yorkshire

Eater 40518

R&2018

p.a. RR.

Din Sir Mr. Antley Jay, an innocent mean is still held prisons in today,
This. WHY!

he had been a SPY,

China.

fought tooth Imail for you would have

release, D even

is re

If other SPIES. To achieve this

TO

exchange d

Is it an

now, in Eng land

Things

England,

murderers, & dom

crime

To be innocent of any vine? thugs) spies,

Meny ns? otomy friends, all seen π do well, under the present thone
Office & Foreign Office

Tay dip forst in

lomat is approaches Chinese government, & release the Communist

approaches to the

а

Journalists,

02: Gry!

now, not next year. A Dis granted Eaghishan now

Jom") R. V. ACKROYD!

CONFIDENTIAL

TOP COPY

920

Cypher/Cat A

PRIORITY

PEKING TO FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

Telno 445

2 August 1969

f.

R

Paczo

CONFIDENTIAL

1969

718

Addressed to F.C.0. telegram No. 445 of 2 August Repeated for
information to Hong Kong

My immediately preceding telegram.

I hope that you will be prepared to give this publicity. I do not
believe that doing so will affect Grey's release. It should help to
dispel any

erroneous impression that improvements in Grey's

conditions amount to humane treatment, and thus deprive Chinese of any
undeserved credit they may be receiving.

Mr. Denson

[Repeated to Hong Kong]

DEPARTMENTAL DISTRIBUTION

F.E.D.

H.K.D.

NEWS DEPT.

CONSULAR DEPT.

I.R.D.

I.P.D.

FFFFF

CONFIDENTIAL

1

EN OLAIR

PRIORITY

TELNO 444

ΤΟ PEKING

UNCLASSIFIED

1/1

TOP COPY

pulso 7/8

FOREIGN AND COMMONWEALTH OFFICE

2 AUGUST 1969

RECTV

DRESSED TO FCO TELNO.444 OF 2 AUGUST. RFI HONGKONG

TRECTS:

MY TELEGRAM 410. WE TODAY TRIED TO SEND TO GREY THROUGH

FE C

THE INFORMATION DEPT. OF THE MINISTRY OF FOREIGIL AFFAIRS

A SMALL SELECTION OF UNCONTROVERSIAL BOOKS.

THESE WERE IMMEDIATELY RETURNED TOGETHER WITH OUR NOTE.

THE MINISTRY TELEPHONED TO SAY THAT THEY WOULD NOT ACCEPT

THE BOOKS AND HAD NO RESPONSIBILITY (1.E. OBLIGATION) TO

PASS THEM TO GREY.

MR. DENSON

DEPARTMENTAL DISTRIBUTION%

F.E.D.

H.K.D.

NEWS D.

CONSULAR D.

I.R.D.

I.P.D.

Sir S. Tomlinson

SECRET

918

pa L20 7/8

THE GREY AND BROOKE CASES:

MR. LONG'S COMPLAINT ·

I

Before submitting my minute of 31 July ovaring a

draft reply to Mr. Long's recent letter about Mr. Anthony

Grey, I tried to confirm with Mr. Long that the reply would

be for his eyes only. (I assumed this to be the case since

Mr. Long's own letter was marked "Private and Confidential'

Mr. Long was, however, absent from his office for a couple

of days.

2.

I

Mr. Long returned my telephone call this morning.

said that in drafting the reply we had assumed that it would

be for his eyes only and that accordingly the draft

(a) had referred to the delicacy of our position in Hong Kong

in terms which we would not use publicly and,

(b) had mentioned the proposals made to the Chinese through

covert channels, of which he was the only person outside

government to be taken into confidence.

1

Mr. Long immediately confirmed that his whole correspondence

with the Secretary of State about Mr. Grey had been on this

basis, and that the reply to his most recent letter would be

certainly treated with similar discretion. If he subsequently

wanted a reply which he could show more widely, e.g. to members

of the staff, he would be in touch with us again.

T

SECRET

1

L

1

+

+

SECRET

Mr. Long referred to the Daily Express report that

Mrs. Grey was about to write to the Secretary of State

drawing comparisons between the Brooke and Grey cases.

He said that this was on her own initiative; Reuters had

had nothing to do with it.

1

+

Copies to: Private Secretary

Mr. Baker

Mr. Godden

Sir L. Monson

Mr. Carter

Mr. Haydon

SECRET

· 2

(James Hurray)

1 August, 1969.

!

i

i

Letter

917

дл

Pe 27/8

Gerald Long, Esq., General Manager, Reuters Ltd., 85 Fleet Street,

Secretary of State

London, E.C.4.

Thank you for your letter of 25 July about

Anthony Gray. I found it extremely well argued, and

indeed moving. Nevertheless, it does not cause me to

alter my views.

I cannot accept that my announcement regarding

Gerald Brooke has invalidated the approach we have so

far adopted in the Grey affair. The overriding

difference between the two cases, and the one most

closely engaging my responsibilities to which you refer,

is the difference of context. As I said in the House,

there is nothing in the manner of Mr. Brooke's release

that is incompatible with the long term interests of

this country. I continue to hold the view, however,

that the premature release of the newsworkers in Hong

Kong would have damaging consequences for our position

in the Colony. If I may speak frankly, our position

there rests on the confidence of the local people in

our intention and ability to retain our control of the

Colony in the face of Chinese pressures. Anything that

led them to believe that we were no longer able to

maintain our authority could quickly be disastrous.

In particular it could very quickly affect the morale

of the police and civil service, on whose loyalty we

Share This Page