I wonder whether

instrust someone to advise me what to

do

ступни

my

where to enquire

eleven, as

вона,

aged

or write, about Erie, his wife, and sou

they have been in Peking

for three years,

and I have not

had a letter from them for six mouths

I do not know what has g

and now

happened to them.

OL

They said that they would get cargol boat from Hong Kong in

November, 1967;

but

my

other s

sou,

went to the Foreign Office a few

and they

weeks

my

ago,

said that son, Eric and his family, did not cross the border into blong
kong the The Foreign Office also asked.

2.

Chinese Government about Eric and his family, but they did not-then-

receive

My

any reply. other son,

has also been to the

Chinese Embassy several times since March, and could not get any
satisfaction from them!

My

Som

Eric, said he would write

letter from Hong Kong before getting

the bost, and as

they have not written, something must have happened. They used to write
regularly every week. until the end of October, 1967. They were not
casual about letter writing, and knew I worried about them; so something
must b stop writing like that.

I

wrong

to make them

my

som Erie

am afraid that and his family must have been detained by the Chinese
Goverment reporter in England, and worked in a publishing office in
China His wife, Marie, taught English to

He was

امه

English.

pupils who already knew some

My Son and his wife did not speak Chinese, although they learned

•hilst living there. My Grandson learned the language there; very well,

I believe.

a little

son or his

.

I do not think that my family would do anything wrong or break any of
the Chinese regulations. They always asked permission for whatever they
wished to do. If they wished to visit another part of China during a
holiday, they asked permission, and if

permission was

attempt to

was refused, they did not

Eric did not criticiss yo China in letters, and we did not write
anything against Chine; so no ofault could have been found with letters
if anyone else read them.

I keep wondering about Eric and his of amily, and thinking that they
must have been detained by the Chinese,

as others have been?

Do

you

think that the Government could ask the Chinese

L

Government about family, again

I am sorry

?

son and his

шу

that this is suc

long letter, and for taking up your

time.

Thank-you very much indeed.

Yours Sincerely,

Sadie Gordon. (Mrs.)

[

+

D.="

F42

7.

A.

6/5

FOREIGN OFFICE, B.V.1.

6 May, 1968.

@

пригор

In Mr. Rodgers' abpence in Strasbourg, I am replying to your letter
I3076 of 25 Abril about Mr. Oray and Mr. Eric Gordon and his family.

You will know from Mr. Rodgers' letter of 29 April that Sir Donald
Hopson has now seen Kr. Grey. We are, of course, contiming our efforts
to secure his release. Now that there has been some development in the
case, we consider that continua- tion of efforts through the diplomatic
channel offers the best prospect of progress.

le share your concern about Mr. Eric Gordon and his family. We first
heard of their disappearance from Kr. Gordon's brother on 1 February.
Mr. Gordon himself has never been in touch with our Mission in Peking in
any way. His brother told us that relatives in England had received no
letters from the family, who were normally good correspondents, since
the end of Gotober.

Te made enquiries in Hong Kong, which confirmed that there was no record
of the family having passed through there and, on 3 February, our
Mission in Peking asked the Chinese authorities for information about
their whereabouts. Despite repeated reminders, no reply has yet been
received.

Other foreigners in the "Friendship_Hostel" where the family lived in
Peking, had not heard that the Gordons were in diffi- culties with the
authorities and had assumed that they had left China as they intended.
Their continuing silence, however, and the Chinese failure to provide
information both suggest that they have been detained. If Mr. Gordon did
indeed have notes and photographe for a book, this may in prezent
circumstances have aroused Chinese suspicions.

for information, though recent experience in other cases gåvan no ground
for expecting that we shall find anything out quickly.

The position of British subjects you have mentioned and of others also
detained in China are a cmise of constant conesra to us. I can assure
you that we are doing all we can to obtain information about, and
consular access to them. Indeed, as you know, Mr. Rodgers saw the
Chinese Chargé d'Affaires on 5 April to express our concern and
dissatisfaction. We still believe, however, that for the present our
best chance of success in

/t:.rough

I. J. Bradley, Esq.,

General Secretary,

National Union of Journalists,

Acorn House,

314/320 Gray's Inn Road,

London, .C.1.

through a general improvement in Anglo-Chinese relations. The visit to
Mr. Grey and the granting of an exit visa to the family of one of the
members of our Mission staff are both signs of some slight improvement;
and of course we shall do our utmost to follow this up.

(James Murray) Far Eastern Department

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

DEGREE TORRAA

Registry No.

F41/42

DRAFT

Letter

To:-

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret,

Secret.

Confidential

Restricted.

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

"In Cooldende

H. J. Bradley, Esq., General Secretary,

National Union of

Journalists,

Acorn House,

314/320 Grey's Inn Road,

London, W.0.1.

Type 1 +

@

From

Munay

Telephone No. & Ex.

Department

In Mr Rodgers

Thank you for your letter IJO/G of

chance in Strabony 25 April about Mr. Grey and Mr. Erde Gordon I am
reflying

and his family.

The Andpust of 24 Appl

Looms

Love will Lown from We are very pleased that Sir Donald Hopson

bee at lost been allowed to seekMr. Grey, and

relieved that in spite of a long period of-

virtual colitary confinement he ie in good

health and overdiag

We are, of cou

to bie ieoletien ee

of course, continuing our efforts to

his

secure a Greyle release. Now that there has

been some development in the case, we consider

that continuation of efforts through the

diplomatic channel offers the best prospect of

progress.

We share your concern about Mr. Eric

Gordon and his family. We first heard of their

disappearance from Mr. Gordon's brother on

1 February- Hr. Gordon himself has never been

in touch with our Mission in Peking in any way.

His brother told us that relatives in England

had received no lettere from the family, who were

normally good correspondente, since the end of

October.

We made enquiries in Hong Kong, which

confirmed that there was no record of the family

having passed through there and, on 3 February,

our Mission in Feking asked the Chinese

/authorities

authorities for information about their

whereabouts. Despite repeated reminders, no

reply has yet been received.

Other foreigners in the "Friendship

Hostel" where the family lived in Peking, had

not heard that the Gordons were in difficulties

with the authorities and had assumed that they

had left China as they intended. Their con-

tinuing silence, however, and the Chinese

failure to provide information both suggest

that they have been detained. If Mr. Gordon

did indeed have notes and photographs for a

book, this may in present circumstances have

aroused Chinese suspicions. We shall continue

to press for information, though recent experience

in other cases gives no ground for expecting

that we shall find anything out quickly.

The position of British subjects you have

mentioned and of others also detained in

China are a cause of constant concern to us.

I can assure you that we are doing all we can

to obtain information about, and, consular

as you kuni, Mi hashgan access to them. Indeed, saw the Chinese

4

Chargé d'Affaires on 5 April to express our

concern and digeatiefaction.

We

Ship believe,

however, that your beat chance of success is through a general
improvement in Anglo-Chinese

relations. The visit to Mr. Grey and the

granting of an exit visa to the family of one

of the members of our Mission staff are both

signs of some slight improvement;

our utmost to follow this up.

And I cans)

shall do A

They

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

Fell42 D.-Pria: 615

FOREIGN OFFICE, S.W.1.

6 May, 1968.

8

In Mr. Rodgers' abgence in Strasbourg, I am replying to your letter of
26 April about your brother, Mr. Brie Gordon, and his family who have
disappeared in China.

do first heard of the disappearanos of Mr. Eric Gordon on ↑ February
from your other brother, Mr. Jeffrey Gordon. Baving confirmed from Hong
Kong that there was no record of Mr. Eric Gordon and his family having
entered the Colony, the British Chargé d'Affaires in Teking asked the
Chinese authorities for information about the family's whereabouts on 3
February. Despite repeated reminders, the Chinese have so far failed to
give us any information.

7

Te shall contime our efforts to obtain information about him and his
family, but in spite of our recent muccess in obtaining access to Kr.
Anthony Grey, the Reuters corres- pondent, about which you may have read
in the press, I fear that - on the basis of our experience in other
caseS cannot hold out any great hope that information will be
forthcoming soon.

I

Miss Linda Gordon,

22 Westbourne Gardena,

Hove,

Sussex, B 3 SPF.

(James Murray) Far Eastern Department

NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN

GENIS KELAA

Registry No.

F21/42

SECURITY CLASSIFICATION

Top Secret.

Secret

Confidential,

Restricted,

Unclassified.

PRIVACY MARKING

In Confidence

DRAFT Letter

To:-

Miss Linda Gordon,

22 Westbourne Gardens,

Hove, Sussex

BN3 5PP.

Type 1 +

8

From

M. Roger Murray

Telephone No. & Ext.

Department

In Mr Rulgus

alssance in Strasburg,

I am

are refly my

+

Thank you for your letter of 26 April

about your brother, Kr. Eric Gordon, and his

family who have disappeared in China.

We first heard of the disappearance of

Mr. Eric Gordon on 1 February from your other

brother, Er. Jeffrey Gordon. Having confirmed

from Hong Kong that there was no record of

Mr. Eric Gordon and his family having entered

the Colony, the British Chargé d'Affaires in

Peking asked the Chinese authorities for

information about the family's whereabouts

on 3 February. Despite repeated reminders,

the Chinese have so far failed to give us any

information.

We shall continue our efforts to obtain

information about him and his family, but in

spite of our recent success in obtaining access

to Mr. Anthony Grey, the Reuters correspondent,

(I had hab thank

about which you will have read in the press,

on the basis of our experience in other cases

I cannot hold out any great hope that

information will be forthcoming soon.

dhe 6 Rang

1.5.

CONFIDENTIAL

RECEIVED IN

ARCHIVES No.31

Стра

Kr. Wilkinson

Mr. Samuel

8- MAY 1968

Flag A

Flag E

Flag C

6

ROBABLE DETENTION OF MR. ERIC GORDON

AND FAMILY

Kr. H. J. Bradley, the General Secretary of the National

Union of Journalists, and Miss Linda Gordon, Mr. Gordon's

sister, have both written asking for information about the

Gordon family. I attach, as requested, draft replies from

Mr. Rodgers.

BACKGROUND

The Gordon Family

2. Mr. Gordon, who reportedly worked for the Chinese Foreign

Languages Press and at some stage as a freelance journalist,

never had any contact with our Mission.

We first learned of

his disappearance and that of his family from an enquiry made

by his brother, Mr. Jeffrey Gordon, on 1 February. He informed

us that the family had been due to leave China early in

November, and no news had been received since October.

Sinoe

they were regular correspondents, their relatives in Britain

were concerned at so long a silence.

3. As a result of this enquiry we asked Peking and Hong Kong, through
which the family was to travel, to make investi- gations about their
whereabouts (telegram No. 121 to Peking). Hong Kong confirmed that they
had no trace of the family's having entered Hong Kong. On 3 February
Peking asked the Chinese authorities for assistance in discovering the
family's

/whereabouts

E

CONFIDENT IAL

CONFIDENTIAL

- 2 -

Flag

Flag E

ATT.

Flag F

Flag G

AFT (W7

whereabouts (Peking telegram No. 102). No reply was

received, but enquiries in the "Friendship Hostel", where the Gordon
family had lived while in Feking, indicated that,

although Mr. Gordon had been a political activist, other

"foreign friends" resident in the hostel had no knowledge

of his detention (Mr. Hunter's letter of 12 February to

Mr. Wilson).

4.

-

-

When no further news was received Peking do not

report the telephonic reminders which they make when the Chinese have
failed to reply to a formal Note we asked them on 12 March for any
available information and again on 25 March, after Mr. Jeffrey Gordon
had told us that he believed his brother to have been making notes in
preparation

for writing a book when he left China.

5. There has still been no reply to requests for information. The case
was raised by Mr. Rodgers when he summoned the Chinese Chargé
d'Affaires, ad interim, on 5 April. Mr. Jeffrey Gordon, with whom Far
Eastern Department are in close

touch, has confirmed that relatives in Britain have been

unable to obtain any information from the Office of the Chinese Chargé
d'Affaires in London, and have not been allowed to see the Chargé
d'Affaires. Lettera written to

senior officials of the Chinese Government remain unanswered.

6. The silence of the Chinese authorities, viewed together

with the sudden cessation of letters to relatives and the report from
Hong Kong that they have no trace of the Gordon

/family's

CONFIDENTIAL

1

CONFIDENTIAL

- 3-

family's having entered the Colony, makes it almost certain

that the family is detained in China. It must be remembered

that other "foreign friends" - Mrs. Epstein and Mr. Shapiro

are known to have been detained. It is unlikely that

Mr. Gordon would have been critical of the régime, but his

preparations for writing a book might tell against him. He

might also possibly have been involved with a Chinese in the

information or cultural field who has been disgraced.

There

7. We have now sent a further telegram to Peking asking

them to make another formal request for information.

is little likelihood that any reply will be received from the

Chinese. We can only hope that the slight improvement in

Anglo-Chinese relatione, illustrated by the agreement to a

visit to Mr. Grey and the issue of some entry visas for our

staff may lead to some progress.

Mr. Grey

8.

Mr. Bradley asks if there is anything the National Union

of Journalists could usefully do to help Mr. Grey.

We are

discussing with Peking and Hong Kong what further action can

be taken on Mr. Grey's behalf, and a submission will be

prepared. I think, however, that action should continue

through diplomatic channels. We should, therefore, discourage

Hr. Bradley from contemplating any initiatives by the National

Union of Journalists.

CONFIDENTIAL

Jauns Muray.

(James Murray) 1 May, 1968

Philkinson

May1.

2

+

"sent it the At u als to

Chassi clatter

свой в него

в

to qui

t

by greates off a

Mutt

ays

chat to Gestuna? otter

Sordena?

?

LB 15.68.

I have already made this scommestation

A

Sermission at the lind

of last week.

We must

..

I

follows it of

Mr Rodgers' is back on

13 May

In his absence, The Roadgers' office have sent back

the letter for chefatch by the Iefortonen.

The Deser

Mr Shary

16 Mary

E

Вра

Fat$25 Estat.

سا

Toy Copy entered KO.

RESTRICTED

LIPHER/CAT A

t

IMMEDIATE FOREIGN OFFICE TO PEKING

TELNO 121 1 FEBRUARY, 1968

WITH (7)

10°

RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No.31

21 FEB 53

F23/21

(KO/GORDON E)

RESTRICTED

ADDRESSED TO PEKING TELEGRAM NUMBER 121 OF 1 FEBRUARY REPEATED FOR
INFORMATION TO HONG KONG

P

BROTHER ANXIOUS ABOUT WHEREABOUTS OF ERIC GORDON, AGE 36, WHO WITH WIFE
MARIE AND SON KIM AGE 11, WERE DUE TO LEAVE PEKING FOR U.K. AT END OF
OCTOBER, GORDON HAD BEEN IN PEKING SINCE FEBRUARY 1965 ON CONTRACT TO
THE PEKING STATE PUBLISHING HOUSE. HE IS ALSO A FREELANCE JOURNALIST.
FAMILY WERE TO TRAVEL TO HONG KONG AND PLANNED TO SPEND TWO DAYS EACH AT
CANTON AND SHANGHAI. GORDON'S ADDRESS IN PEKING WAS FLAT 8642, P.0. BOX
300, PEKING. RELATIVES RECEIVES MAIL REGULARLY BUT HAVE HAD NO NEWS
SINCE 28 OCTOBER.

2.

PLEASE JNVESTIGATE AND REPORT.

·

SOSFA

FILES

CONSULAR DEPT.

FHC

:

I

109.

RESTRICTED

p.a.

Seemly

+

-

P

A

Top Copy entered Ko.

RECEIVED IN [ARCHIVES No.31

109

CONFIDENTIAL

21 FEB 1968

.Cypher/Cat.A

PEKING TO

FOREIGN OFFICE

F23/21

Telno. 102

3 February 1968

108

CONFIDENTIAL

Addressed to Foreign Office telegram No. 102

of 3 February.

Repeated for information to Hong Kong.

Share This Page