вс
648
File No.
FC: 1/39.
PART
(M.B. The grading of this jacket must be the same as that of the highest
graded document contained in it. The appropriate sperading sắp must be
affixed when ever necessary.)
CONFIDENTIAL
FOREIGN OFFICE
DEPT. r:
TITLE:
THE ARREST OF
t
t
CASTERN
CHINA! POLITICAL AFFAIRS INTERNAL
DEPT.
---זו חווי
REFER TO
NAME
ESS
Po...
JB.
F
In
Js.
A.
Gs.
PA.
DATE
<p> <span></span></p><!--more--><p></p>
DEPT.
4.
AIY
122/4
12312
сс
"FORZIGN FRIENDS"
REFER TO
NAME
JB
THE
DATE DEPT.
15/5.
14/5
2/5.
4
REFER TO
NAME
DATE
--WIL
IL
FB
PA
1.
ILL.
MAZT.
ezt Ess.
14
Vu
11/5.
#
Bró 75. 9/5.
79
LD
RECİSTRY ADD
Room No. 138
F.Ó. Building,
DO NOT RETAIN FILES AND PAPERS UNNECESSARILY
RETURN THEM TO REGISTRY FOR B.U. OR P.A.
FILE
OPENED
CLOSED
1/4/68.1
FILE No.
FCI 39.
INB The grading of this jacket must be the same as that of the highest
gradeų
scument contained in R. The
ice nagrading dịp must be aftred when ever
CONFIDENTIAL
LILI
Downing Street.
PART
.
в
L
FNxW
RECEIVED IN {ARCHIVES No.31) 11 OCT 1968
65 Mount Street, HEIDELBERG. VIC. 3084 30th September, 1968
LAST PAPER
مه
x)
Sir Donald Hopson,
ex-Ambassador to China,
Foreign Office,
LONDON 3.7.1.
Dear Sir Donald,
proper 11/10
I am most grateful to you for your full reply of September 13 concerning
the Epsteins. I am glad to know that the Foreign Office will continue to
pursue the matter but one can hardly be optimistic about the result,
I should be very glad if you would instruct the appropriate official to
send me any further information that may be obtained in the future.
Incidentally, Kra. Epstein comes of an old Yorkshire family and it
occurs to me that information could possibly be obtained from that
source. I do not know the address of any member. The correct spelling is
not Cholmondley. However, the pronounciation of 'Chumlee' is retained,
LAST PAPER
Yourg sincerely,
Листьяства
Oscar Mendelsohn
x Mr. Boys.
Her in spells
LAST PAPER
it Each Cholmeley
CAST PAPER
1
-
-
AEROGRAMMI
BY AIR MAIL · PAR UNI
AIST FOLD HERE
航
MELBOURNE AUSTRALIA
|
1
.466
10c
SIR DONALD HOFSON
FORLIQN OFFICE.
LONDON
Teat 3
8.W.1. 16 Belosa
Embank
S.W.I
(COUNTRY OF DESTINATION)
SECOND POLO HERE
SENDER'S NAME AND ADDRESS.
Üsoar Kendelsohn,
65 bunt Street,
Hoidelberg, Victoris. 3084
IF ANYTHING IS ENCLOSED OR ANY TAPE OR STICKER ATTACHED, THIS FORM MUST
BEAR POSTAGE AT THE RATE FOR APMAIL LETTERS.
SUIT HERE
[
Note No. 138
VED IN
24
27/5
AR
AK-
VES No.31
27SEP 1968
Fa1/39
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires present their compliments to
the Consular Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
People's Republic of China, and have the honour to refer to their Fotes
mimbered 76, 84 and 120 of the 24th of June, 4th of July and 17th af
August, 1968, which requested confirmation of the reported arrest of
Hrs. Elsie Epstein, details of ary charges brought against her and
immediate consular access to her.
They
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires have so far received no
reply to the above mentioned Notes. again urgently request the Consular
Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to furnish the information
requested on the above British subject and to permit immediate consular
access to
her.
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires avail themselves of this
opportunity to renew to the Consular Department of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China the assurance of their
highest consideration.
office of the British Chargé d'Affaires, PEKIKO
14 September, 1968
Tote To. 136
RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No 31
27 SEP 1968
1281/39
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires present their compliments to
the Consular Department of the Hinistry of Foreign Affairs of the
People's Republic of China, and have the honour to refer to their Notes
mumbered 76, 86 and 118 of the 24th of June, 4th of July and 17th of
August, 1968, which requested confirmation of the reported arrest of Kr.
Kichael Shapiro, details of any charges brought against
him and inmediate consular socess to him,
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires have so år received no reply
to the above mentioned Notes. They again urgently request the Consular
Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to furnish the information
requested on the above British subject and to permit immediate consular
access to hin,
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires avail themselves of this
opportunity to renew to the Consular Department of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China the assurance of their
highest consideration,
office of the British Chargé d'Affaires, PETT
14 September, 1968
28
F4139
Duid
£816/9
PESS AÐ IN
PL
ARCHIVES -16. POREIGN OFFICE, 8.#.1.
17 SEP 1968
13 September, 1968.
F21/39
Thank you for your letter of 15 August about Mrs. Israel Epstein née
Elsie Fairfax-Cholmondley. She and her husband were employed by the
Chinese in Peking and their political sympathies lay with the present
Chinese Government and they avoided all contact with the British
Mission. It was not until March of this year that members of the Mission
heard rumours t at both she and her husband had been detained by the
Chinese. The rumours suggested that the detention had taken place
towards to end of last year or at the beginning of this. Since than the
Mission has made repasted representations to the Chinese authorities
requesting information about the whereabouts of Mrs. Epstein and
consular access to her if she is in fɛet in detention. Approaches have
also been made by Foreign Office Ministers in London to the Chinese
Chargé d'Affaires here. None of our efforts have however produced any
response from the Chinese so that we are forced to assume that Mrs.
Epstein and her husband are indeed detained. We shall of course continue
our attempts to obtain information about Mrs. Epstein but the pattern of
this case is all too familiar to us cince there are at present a dozen
or more other British subjects who are probably detained by the Chinese
to none of whom consular access has been allowed; in no case have the
Chinese answered our requests for information.
The fact that Mr. and Mrs. Epstein were employed by the Chinese probably
means that the chance of any intervention on our part being helpful is
even less than would normally be the 0280. I am sorry that there is
nothing more specific or encouraging I can aɛy.
Ir. Oscar Mendelsohn,
65 Mount Street,
Heidelberg, N.22,
Victoria, N.S.M.,
Australis.
(D. C. Hopson)
L30
ра
pa fox's
2
1
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN.
Kr
Registry Fa
No.
Fa/39
Top Secret. Secret.
Confidential. Restricted. Open.
Draft. Letter to:
Oscar Kendelsohn, 65 Mount Street, Heidelberg, N. 22, Victoria, N.S.7.
Australia
тейротрави lam with the
стайна present emnina Gory, and they avoided me trom contact with
the Burtum Mishu.
ir Donald Hopson
Mr.
For hi D. Hopson
కు
Dear Sir,
27
Thank you for your letter of 15 August
about Mrs. Israel Epstein née Elsie Fairfax-
Cholmondley.
Unfortunately we know very little about
Mrs. Epstein, but I can of course confirm
that as you suspect her political views are
well to the left. She and her husband were-
both employed by the Chinese in Peking and
It was not until March of this year that men-
The
bers of py Mission heard rumours that both she
and her husband had been detained by the
Chinese authorities, The rumours suggested
that the detention had taken placed towards
the end of last year or the beginning of
this. Since then the British Mission r
representation Beking has made repeated ápproaches to the
Chinese authorities with request for
information about the whereabouts of Mrs.
Epstein apá requesting consular access to
her if she is in fact in detention.
Approaches have also been made by Foreign
orrice Ministers in London to the Chinese
Chargé d'Affaires here. None of our efforts
amy response
have however produced a reply from the
Chinese so that we are forced to assume that
Mrs. Epstein and her husband are indeed
detained, We shall of course continue our
attem, ts to obtain information about Mra,
Epstein but the ether-British-subjecte
pattern of this case is all too familiar to
a Dozen al sol us since there are at present other
British subjects who are probably detained
by the Chinese to none of whom he consular
Las
access/been allowed and in no case have the
/been
/Chinese
Chinese answered our requests for information.
I regret that I cannot give you any pore
spécifie information.
NP. The fact met the Amo Epsrem
тили
were emptines muy the
esmiese proas
nieuw
The chanw of any infravention our part buny hurtful
فى
wen less than / now
瓦
normally be the
д
I am Sothy
ŵ
потому nom
cam.
Mut
Тим
male
of incrningng
sperits of
сил
Out'
12/12
ร
NOTHING TO BE WRITTEN IN THIS MARGIN.
hota
120
LI
31
i
F4321
26
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires present
their
ir compliments to the Consular Department of the Ministry of Foreign
Affairs of the People's Republie of Chine, and have the honour to refer
to their Notes numbered 76 and 84 of the 24th of June, 1968 and 4th of
July, 1968, which requested confirmation of the reported arrest of Era.
Eisia Iystein, details of any charges brought against her and
immediate consular access to her.
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires have so far received no
reply to the above mentioned Notes. They again urgently request the
Consular Department of Ministry of Foreign Affairs to furnish the
information requested on the above British sah ́oot and to permit
immediate congular access to her.
The Office of the British ChargỂ d'affaires avail themselves of this
opportunity to renew to the Consular Department of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of Chine
highest consideration.
SEERPESS of their
of
British Chargé d'Affaires,
17 August, 1968
Lote No. 118
+
TRES {AR
Fa/39
25
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires present their compliments to
the Consular Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the
People's Republic of China, and have the honour to refer to their Botas
mabered 76 and 86 of the 24th of Jane and 4th of July, 1968, which
requested. confirmation of the reported arrest of Ir. Kichael Shapiro,
details of any charges brought against hia and innodiate congelar socess
to him.
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires have so far received no
reply to the above mentioned Hotes. They again urgently request the
Consular Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs to furnish the
information requested on the above British subject and to permit
immediate consular sceens to kin.
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires avail themselves of this
opportunity to renew to the Consular Department of the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China the assurance of their
highest consideration,
fa
Office of PRIINO
British Chargé d'Affaires,
17 August, 1968
15th August, 1968
RECEIVED IN 'ARCHIVES No.31
- 6 SEP 1968
Fa1/39
Sir Donald Hopson,
ex-Ambassador to China,
Foreign Office,
LONDON.
Dear Sir:
During my stay in New York shortly before World War II I employed as
secretary an English girl, Miss Elsie Fairfax-Cholmeley, a very
accomplished and poised young woman. Later she joined the Institute of
Pacific Affairs. After I returned to Australia (where I was C.0. of the
Scientific Section of the R.A.A.F. for the war years) she wrote to me
from China. This correspondence continued on a strictly personal level
until one or two years ago. Ι gathered that she had become an ardent
supporter of Red Ching, that she had married an American journalist
called Israel Epstein and that they had adopted two Chinese orphans. I
formed the impression that she was persona grata with the Chinese
Government and that both she and her husband were employed in some
literary capacity.
About six or nine months ago I was astonished to read in the Australian
Press that the Epsteins had been arrested aa spies. I have never met
Israel Epstein but I am sure Elsie would have remained a person of
integrity.
It occurs to me that you may know the facts of the case and I would be
most grateful if you would let me know briefly what has happened.
My wife and I have a high regard for Elsie as a person though, of
course, we do not share her presumed political beliefs.
раз
anto
4/9.
Australia
.2.
You will, of course, need to know that I am a reliable person. I am a
well-known writer, current President of the Fellowship of Australian
Writers and a member of the U.N.E.S.C.0. Committee on Letters. My
publishers are Macmillan of London. My status can be established from
Who's Who in Australia, the International Who's Who in Writing (London)
and similar publications.
I hope you will understand our anxiety and let me have any information
you possess.
Yours faithfully,
Deshandelsh
Oscar Mendelsohn
Enter
老
23
UNCLASSIFIED
(PEK/5)
Dear John
Office of the British
Mrs. Elsie Epstein
Chargé d'Affaires,
PEKING.
27 July, 1968.
RECEIVED IN
ARCHIVES No. 31
AUG 1968
Fell39
I am replying to your letter FC 1/39 of 18 July instead of Alastair
Hunter since I have taken over responsibility for Consular matters.
2. In answer to your enquiry I have to confirm that we have had no
reaction to our Note No. 44 of 6 May.
Yours
ever,
Roger
(R. R. Garside)
E. J. Sharland, Esq.,
FAR EASTERN DEPARTMENT,
FOREIGN OFFICE.
(FC 1/39)
UNCLASS IF IED
FOREIGN OFFICE, $.W.1.
18 July, 1968.
Nrs. Elsie Epstein
Please refer to John Boyd's letter of 23 April with which he enclosed a
letter for Mrs. Epstein from her sister. You passed the letter on to the
M.F.A. under cover of your Note No. 44 of 6 May.
2.
I am sure that you would have let us know if your Note had elicited any
reply from the Chinese. It would clear the position up for us, though,
if you could confirm that you have had no reaction from our Chinese
friends.
A. J. Hunter, Eaq.,
PEXING.
(E. J. Sharland) Far Eastern Department
22.
(PC 1/39)
Dir.:).
235/6
FOREIGN OFFICE, 8.W.1.
5 June, 1968.
21
Thank you very much for your letter of 25 Way about the probable
detention in China of your wife's brother, David Crook, It was kind of
you to take the trouble to confira our earlier telephone conversation in
writing.
As a result of the same report in the press, Kro. Baker has been in
touch with me and has let me see letters aba has received this year from
her sister and her thres nephews. From these letters it seems clear that
Mrs. Crook and her sons are not in detention although we must continue
to assume that Mr. Grook himself is not at liberty until we have some
clear evidence to the contrary. We shall therefore continue to press the
Chinese for information about Mr. Crook's whereabouts and for cons ular
access to his if he is in fact detained.
I will certainly let you know if we receive any further information.
(E. J. Bharland) Per Eastern Department
Alick Altman, Esq.,
222 Musters Road,
heat Bridgford,
Nottinghamsidre, 102 7DE.
24%
1
(PO 1/39)
DiD
285/6
FOREIGN OFFICE, S.W.1.
5 June, 1968.
It was most kind of you to come and see ne yesterday and to let me keep
the letters from you sister and nephews to you. I have taken copies of
them and eralose them herewith. I regret that the note attached to the
letter of 29 March was destroyed during the process of reproduction, but
I include instead the copy, not very good I am afraid, which was
obtained.
In view of the letters we must I think accept that your sister and
nephews are not in detention. Equally, however, until we have somewhat
firmer evidence to the contrary we will continue to work on the
assumption that your brother in law in detained. We shall accordingly
continue to press the Chinese authorities for information about his
whereabouts and for consular access to him if he is not at liberty.
I shall of course keep you informed of any information which we receive.
Yrs. *
Baker, 6 Village Road,
Finchley,
London, N.3.
Tel. Fo. Pinchley 5343
+
(5, J. Sharland) Far Eastern Department
$
بلال
20
+
UNCLASSIFIED
I. Boyd, Esq.,
Wa Eastern Department.
RECEIVED IN ARCHIVES No.31
1 6 MAY 1968
Els 19 Edý
FC
With the compliments of
the
British Chargé d'Affaires
PEKING. 6 May, 1968
(A. J. HUNTER)
B
Reference your letter to Alistair Hunter of 23 April.
Jam. 275
The Office of the British Chargé d'Affaires present
their complimente to the Consular Department of the Finistry
of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China and
have the honour to refer to their Note Fo. 30 of the 2nd of
April naking for information about Kra. Elsie Epstein and
Kr. Michael Shayiro. They have not yet received a reply
to this Neto,
The Offios would be grateful if the Consular Department
would let them know as soon as possible whether Ers. Spetsin
and ir, Shapire are in fact in detention as has been
reported, and if so what charges if any have been brought
against thom. They also request early oeneular socess te
them.
In the mountine a sister of Era, Epstein, Mrs. R.
1. I
Coffrey, has asked the office je try and arrange for the
delivery to Era. Apatein of the enclosed letter which
informs Krs. Epstein of a serious accident to a young
member of her family. The Office would be grateful for
the assistance of the Consular Departacat in arranging for
this letter to be delivered to Ers, Epstein; and if she is
in detention they request that she be given the opportunity
bo
of sending a letter of acknowledgment to her sister.