+

CONFIDENTIAL

-

THIS IS A COPY

THE ORIGINAL HAS BEEN RETAINED IN THE DEPARTMENT UNDER SECTION 3(4) OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 1958

+

+

CONFIDENTIAL

Secretary of State

M. Wilford If you agree, I will put this

letter

to hard Bridges.

Domatt

Thick

that it com love

Foreign and Commonwealth Office

En L-ban

London S.W.1

af that

wether. 30 November, 1973

معبرات

W Center our net refect on to make this concerson In a wher

#

Sometime it will be right 2. beg till on the but when other things beg
he go wrong / I thinn no sign of the ? I/II the 7

love slite

philes'

+

Mmaller with hot the live

**

ward in

LA

When you and Tom Brimelow spoke on 27 November about the issue of
Chinese official representation in Hong Kong, he undertook to let you
have a more detailed account of the views of the Governor of Hong Kong,
and of Sir John Addis.

I attach a paper which sets out at greater length the considerations
which MacLehose and Addis think important. These are based in the main
on two despatches from Peking and Hong Kong, copies of which are
enclosed in case you wish to have them for your own reference. I also
attach a minute from Mr. Royle to the Prime Minister.

You will see from paragraph 3 of the enclosed paper that our conclusion
is that the arguments put forward by MacLehose for rejecting the Chinese
proposal outweigh those put forward by Addis for accepting it.

The Lord Bridges,

10 Downing Street,

London, S.W.1.

CONFIDENTIAL

{Syd) P. H. Graecar.

104

E

Prime Minister

CHINESE REPRESENTATION IN HONG KONG

As I mentioned to you on Tuesday evening when we spoke

about this, we are now providing you with further briefing.

This consists principally of a condensed summary of the

facts and arguments.

We have also sent despatches from

Sir John Addis in Peking and the Governor himself arguing

their sides of the case.

You may not have time to read the despatches

but I urge you to read the summary

I should be very glad to discuss this further with you,

if you should so wish.

A.R.

-

30 November, 1973

Anthony Royle

4

1

CONFIDENTIAL

THIS IS A COPY

THE ORIGINAL HAS BEEN RETAINED IN THE DEPARTMENT UNDER SECTION 944) OF
THE PUBLIC RECORDS ACT 1958

!

4.

1

-

·

CONFIDENTIAL

CHINESE REPRESENTATION IN HONG KONG

1. The Chinese have proposed that there should be an

official Chinese representative in Hong Kong. They believe

this to be a logical consequence of the exchange of Ambassador:.

An official representative could act as a link between the

Hong Kong Government and the Chinese Government; and improve

relations by explaining Chinese Government policies to local

Chinese. They maintain there would be no intention to set

up a dual régime. They accept that Britain rules Hong Kong,

but maintain that all of it, ceded as well as leased territory,

is part of China.

ARGUMENTS OF THE GOVERNOR

2. The Governor is strongly opposed to the appointment of a

Representative. He believes the Chinese would like an

official representative in Hong Kong, but that they do not

attach overriding importance to it in the context of Sino-

British relations. The grounds for his objections are:

(a) It would not be interpreted as a routine, far less a

reassuring diplomatic move. Accession to the Chinese

demand would give a jolt to public confidence. The

population of Hong Kong would be likely to see the

arrival of an Official Chinese Representative as an

important act in the reassertion of Chinese control

over the Colony. It would set in motion new forces and

create new uncertainties at a critical time.

-

1

CONFIDENTIAL

/ (b)

CONFIDENTIAL

(b)

(c)

Acceptance of the appointment would be tantamount to

establishing an alternative focus of loyalty in Hong Kong.

As such it would irrevocably undermine the authority of

Governor and lead towards a Macao type situation in the

Colony. Because of our need to retain control in and

over the Colony such a situation would be more likely to

lead to premature confrontation than to cement good

relations with Peking.

Such an appointment, whatever title its holder were given,

would carry enormous prestige and influence over the Chinese population
of the Colony (99). No matter whet

assurances the Chinese Government gave about the scope and nature of the
Representative's functions, these

would be open to conflicting interpretations. Moreover

given the Chinese claim to sovereignty over Hong Kong it i very
difficult to guess what limits China would accent

on what it saw as its legitimate intereste. Large secti

of the Chinese community would inevitably look to him to intervene on
specific issues on their behalf. Although

such occasions might at first bo few, they could incresce

rapidly. This might become critical at times of stress,

e.g. a recurrence of communist-inspired violence in the

Colony. An official Representative (and through him the Chinese
Government) would face the choice of satisfyir-

those who sought his support or of losing face by refundne

it. The standing of the Chinese Government in Peking

/ would

2

CONFIDENTIAL

L

CONFIDENTIAL

(a)

(e)

would be directly involved.

While the present Governtent

in Peking might be prepared to risk a loss of face As

long as the situation in Hong Kong did not threaten to

get out of control - we cannot say how a future Chinese

Government would react.

The increased uncertainties rising from the presence of

an official Representative would damage business confidenc›

in Hong Kong. Investment would suffer severely and the

prosperity and the security of the Colony could be gravel:

endangered. The flow of funds from Government and private

sources abroad might dry up.

The decision to accept an official Representative once

taken would be irrevocable; but if we maintain our

refusal, we could quickly reverse our attitude if it

proved untenable.

Once an official Representative was

(1)

established we could do nothing to control his activitien,

far less expel him, without seeking the major con-

frontation with China which we wish to avoid. He would,

moreover, permanently be at risk and a most tempting

target for assassination by a KMT agent provocateur.

It is unlikely that the request for an official Repro-

sentative in Hong Kong would be the last major politiem?

demand the Chinese would make of us. To give my might

merely whet their appetite, and encourage them to main

demands in other fields.

1J

- 3 -

CONFIDENTIAL

/ (g)

CONFIDENTIAL

(g) The majority of the non-communist Chinese press already

(h)

support the line on a Chinese representative taken up

till now by HNG. The Governor would find it impossible

in the light of this to persuade public opinion generally

that greater dangers than those already perceived in the

acceptance of an official Representative would be imminent

if our refusal were maintained. It would be argued that

we should wait and see.

There is no practical need for a change in the present

arrangements for Chinese representation in Hong Kong,

which work efficiently. The following organs of the

Chinese Government in Hong Kong are run, and to a large

extent staffed, by Chinese Government officials: the

New China News Agency (NCNA), The Bank of China, The China

Resources Co Ltd and the China Travel Service. Of thean

the NCNA already acts as a co-ordinating body; its

functions are closely akin to those of a Consulate-Gona"".

but it has of course no official cachet. It acts as the

established channel of communication on the political side

between the Hong Kong Government and the authorities in

Peking. Any need for change can be met by discreetly

advancing the degree of contact between the Governor and

the present "unoffical" representative (who is the Frað

of the New China News Agency).

- 4·

CONFIDENTIAL

9.

CONFIDENTIAL

ARGUMENTS OF HN AMBASSADOR IN PEKING

2. Sir John Addia believes that there is force in the

Chinese argument that the absence of an official Representative

in Hong Kong is an anomaly.

He believes that we should not

Instead we should, in

return a negative reply to the Chinese.

further discussions with the Chinese, seek to define as closely

as possible the functions and status of a Chinese official

Representative in Hong Kong and to dress up the appointment

in such a way that it can be presented to public opinion

without shaking confidence in the Colony. His argument is

based on the following considerations:-

(a) The absence of a Representative was comprehensible while

full diplomatic relations between the Chinese Governingt

and HMG did not exist. But our agreement to exchange Ambassadors and the
subsequent improvement in our relation

with Peking has brought about a new situation.

ê

(D)

We need

to make our voice heard in discussions of Asian affairs;

and so long as Chinese ambitions in this regard are not

fulfilled our relationship with the Chinese Government

and its political value will inevitably be somewhat

diminished.

To accept the Chinese proposal would, to some extent,

place a seal on the present status of Hong Kong and riva us some
assurance that the evolution of Hong Kong during the years ahead will
take place with the concurrence of

the Chinese Government. Our position in Hong Kong

5.

5 -

CONFIDENTIAL

/ itself

CONFIDENTIAL

itself depends on the Chinese Government's goodwill.

Our position cannot be static but must evolve with develop *

circumstances, particularly over the next quarter of a

century leading up to the end of the Lease of the New

Territories in 1997. We shall need the Chinese

Government's co-operation over each stage in this

evolving situation. The appointment of an official

Representative would have the double advantage of

facilitating this co-operation in the future and

formalising Chinese acquiescence in the present position

now.

(c) To the Chinese this is a question of principle.

If 19

continue to return a refusal, we can expect a steady

deterioration of bilateral relations on all fronta,

political as well as commercial. The Chinese might vell

steer important contracts towards our foreign commercial

competitors. They could also refuse to contemplate

progress on such matters as the signature of the Air

Services Agreement.

CONCLUSION

3. Our conclusion is that the arguments put forward by th

Governor of Hong Kong against accepting the Chinese proponial,

Pause they involve a serious risk of loss of confidence in t

Colony and thus severely affect its economic life, outweigh

6.

CONFIDENTIAL

/ those

1

CONFIDENT FAL

those put forward by H M Ambassador at Peking for accepting 11.

Our prime consideration must remain the security, stability ani

prosperity of Hong Kong. It would therefore be wrong to accept

an irreversible proposal which could put these factors at risk,

4. It should however be stressed that the Governor is well

aware, in the context of relations between HMG and the Chinese

Government in general, of the need to improve working contacts

with Chinese Government officials in Hong Kong. Hitherto no

Governor has had direct contact with employees of the Chinone

Government in the Colony. With our approval Sir Murray

MacLehose has embarked on a policy of encouraging such contacts.

There is evidence that the Chinese Government have noted, and

responded to, this development.

- 7 -

CONFIDENTIAL

3/14

H L1 Davies Esq

FED

FCO

CONFIDENTIAL

BRITISH EMBASSY

PEKING

29 November 1973

(1031)

Fest

Hove

The Ivan's

Ihr Hervey

1. Squat thing

Jn.

Jean Hugh

My isan

CHINESE REFRESENTATION IN HONG KONG

1.

Enter

David Bonavia told me yesterday that, when discussing the question of
immigration into Hong Kong with Chang Tseng-tsu of the Information
Department of the MFA (Mr Ma's successor) Chang linked the problem
immediately with Chinese Representation in Hong Kong on lines similar to
Mr Wang Tung's kite-flying with Armbassad ov

2.

Bonavia also said that a former deputy head of NCNA in Hong Kong whom he
had known in Hong Kong had, unprompted, peddled the Chinese position on
representation in Hong Kong to him with some force, when they met by
chance not long ago.

чери та

ww

Miche

MJ Richardson

Copied to:

T J B George Esq APA

HONG KONG

wiń any oice Rin Evans

4112

MFA Zão off cials do not

speak wino

voro. I am

myself made-ciel sanguine

thai Chon En-law will/would

ནང་ ཅག ]ཁན(oང་"

moi link Chiccoeryoneŵation

excepoi itsusiraiwey

issue

ат

14 De

be

1773

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

CHINESE REPRESENTATION IN HONG KONG

сво

る。

FE/D (103 Bettervey

FEH 3/201/1

Enter

Друг

1. The Chinese have proposed that there should be an

official Chinese representative in Hong Kong. They believe

this to be a logical consequence of the exchange of Ambassadors.

An official representative could act as a link between the

Hong Kong Government and the Chinese Government; and improve

relations by explaining Chinese Government policies to local

Chinese. They maintain there would be no intention to set

up a dual régime. They accept that Britain rules Hong Kong,

but maintain that all of it, ceded as well as leased territory,

is part of China.

ARGUMENTS OF THE GOVERNOR

2.

The Governor is strongly opposed to the appointment of a

Representative. He believes the Chinese would like an

official representative in Hong Kong, but that they do not

attach overriding importance to it in the context of Sino-

British relations. The grounds for his objections are:

(a) It would not be interpreted as a routine, far less a

Accession to the Chinese

reassuring diplomatic move.

demand would give a jolt to public confidence. The

population of Hong Kong would be likely to see the

arrival of an Official Chinese Representative as an

important act in the reassertion of Chinese control

over the Colony. It would set in motion new forces and

create new uncertainties at a critical time.

1

CONFIDENTIAL

/ (b)

CONFIDENTIAL

(b) Acceptance of the appointment would be tantamount to

ê

establishing an alternative focus of loyalty in Hong Kong.

As such it would irrevocably undermine the authority of the

Governor and lead towards a Macao type situation in the

Colony. Because of our need to retain control in and

over the Colony such a situation would be more likely to

lead to premature confrontation than to cement good

relations with Peking.

(c) Such an appointment, whatever title its holder were given,

Large sections

would carry enormous prestige and influence over the

Chinese population of the Colony (99%). No matter what

assurances the Chinese Government gave about the scope

and nature of the Representative's functions, these

would be open to conflicting interpretations, Koreover

given the Chinese claim to sovereignty over Hong Kong it is

very difficult to guess what limits China would accept

on what it saw as its legitimate interests.

of the Chinese community would inevitably look to him to

intervene on specific issues on their behalf. Although

such occasions might at first be few, they could increase

rapidly. This might become critical at times of atress,

e.g. a recurrence of communist-inspired violence in the

Colony. An official Representative (and through him the

Chinese Government) would face the choice of satisfying

those who sought his support or of losing face by refusing

it. The standing of the Chinese Government in Peking

/ would

2

CONFIDENTIAL

CONFIDENTIAL

(a)

would be directly involved.

While the present Government

in Peking might be prepared to risk a loss of face

-

long as the situation in Hong Kong did not threaten to

get out of control

-

白您

we cannot say how a future Chinese

Government would react.

The increased uncertainties rising from the presence of

an official Representative would damage business confidence

in Hong Kong. Investment would suffer severely and the

prosperity and the security of the Colony could be gravely

endangered. The flow of funds from Government and private

sources abroad might dry up.

(e) The decision to accept an official Representative once

taken would be irrevocable; but if we maintain our

refusal, we could quickly reverse our attitude if it

proved untenable. Once an official Representative was

established we could do nothing to control his activities,

far less expel him, without seeking the major con-

frontation with China which we wish to avoid. He would,

moreover, permanently be at risk and a most tempting

target for assassination by a KMT agent provocateur.

(f)

It is unlikely that the request for an official Repre-

sentative in Hong Kong would be the last major political

demand the Chinese would make of us. To give way might

merely whet their appetite, and encourage them to make

demands in other fields.

-3-

CONFIDENTIAL

/ (8)

CONFIDENTIAL

(g) The majority of the non-communist Chinese press already

support the line on a Chinese representative taken up

till now by HMG.

in the light of this to persuade public opinion generally

that greater dangers than those already perceived in the

acceptance of an official Representative would be imminent

if our refusal were maintained, It would be argued that

The Governor would find it impossible

we should wait and see.

(h) There is no practical need for a change in the present

arrangements for Chinese representation in Hong Kong,

which work efficiently. The following organe of the

Chinese Government in Hong Kong are run, and to a large

extent staffed, by Chinese Government officials: the

New China News Agency (NCNA), The Bank of China, The China

Resources Co Ltd and the China Travel Service. Of these

the NONA already acts as a co-ordinating body; ite

functions are closely akin to those of a Consulate-General,

but it has of course no official cachet. It acts as the

established channel of communication on the political aide

between the Hong Kong Government and the authorities: in

Peking. Any need for change can be met by discreetly

advancing the degree of contact between the Governor and

the present "unoffical" representative (who is the Read

of the New China News Agency).

- 4

CONFIDENTIAL

/ 2.

-

CONFIDENTIAL

ARGUMENTS OF HM AMBASSADOR IN PEKING

2. Sir John Addis believes that there is force in the

Chinese argument that the absence of an official Representative

in Hong Kong is an anomaly. He believes that we should not

return a negative reply to the Chinese. Instead we should, in

further discussions with the Chinese, seek to define as closely

as possible the functions and status of a Chinese offical

Representative in Hong Kong and to dress up the appointment

in such a way that it can be presented to public opinion

without shaking confidence in the Colony. His argument is

based on the following considerations:-

(a) The absence of a Representative was comprehensible while

full diplomatic relations between the Chinese Government

and HMG did not exist. But our agreement to exchange

Ambassadors and the subsequent improvement in our relations

with Peking has brought about a new situation. We need

to make our voice heard in discussions of Asian affairs;

and so long as Chinese ambitions in this regard are not

fulfilled our relationship with the Chinese Government

and its political value will inevitably be somewhat

diminished.

(b) To accept the Chinese proposal would, to some extent,

place a seal on the present status of Hong Kong and give

us some assurance that the evolution of Hong Kong during

the years ahead will take place with the concurrence of

the Chinese Government.

Our position in Hong Kong

-

- 5 -

CONFIDENTIAL

/ite f

+

+

Share This Page